放射性武器
奇纳
医学
荟萃分析
批判性评价
梅德林
物理疗法
外科
内科学
替代医学
病理
心理干预
政治学
精神科
法学
作者
Toby Oliver Smith,Farshid Ejtehadi,Rachel H. Nichols,Leigh Davies,Simon Thomas Donell,Caroline Blanca Hing
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00167-009-0909-7
摘要
Controversy exists regarding the clinical and radiological differences in outcomes between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements (TKR). The aim of this study was to compare these two TKR designs using a meta-analysis of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED in addition to a review of unpublished material. All included papers were critically appraised using a modified PEDro critical appraisal tool. Thirty-three studies were eligible, assessing the outcomes of 3532 TKRs. Analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in clinical or radiological outcomes and complication rates between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKRs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI