THE ROLE OF SEX STEROID HORMONES IN MODULATING THE RESPONSIVENESS OF THE ANTERIOR PITUITARY GLAND TO LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING FACTOR IN THE FEMALE RAT

SUMMARY The role of ovarian hormones in the development of increased sensitivity of the anterior pituitary gland to synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LH-RF) which occurs before and during the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the rat has been examined. The response of the pituitary gland was determined, with respect to the secretion of LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), after the intravenous injection of 50 ng LH-RF/100 g body weight. The LH-RF was injected 30–60 min after the administration of sodium pentobarbitone at either 13.30 h or 18.80 h of pro-oestrus. Blood samples were collected immediately before and at frequent intervals after the injection of LH-RF, and the concentration of LH and FSH in these samples was measured by radioimmunoassay. Ovariectomy at 10.00–11.00 h of dioestrus reduced the LH response to LH-RF injected at 14.00 h of pro-oestrus, while oestradiol benzoate administered immediately after ovariectomy restored and even augmented this response. These data together with the finding that administration of the antioestrogen, ICI 46 474, at 17.00 h of dioestrus reduced the LH response to LH-RF injected on the afternoon of pro-oestrus indicates that the initial phase of increased pituitary sensitivity to LH-RF is dependent upon the marked rise in the concentration of oestradiol-17β in plasma which precedes the preovulatory surge of LH. The abrupt, marked increase in pituitary sensitivity to LH-RF, which, in the normal cycle, occurs between 14.00 and 18.30 h of pro-oestrus, failed to develop in rats ovariectomized on the morning of dioestrus whether or not oestradiol benzoate was administered after the operation. However, the LH response to LH-RF injected on the evening of pro-oestrus increased significantly when progesterone was administered at 13.00 h of pro-oestrus in rats ovariectomized and treated with oestradiol benzoate at 10.00–11.00 h of dioestrus. This suggests that the development of the second phase of increased pituitary sensitivity to LH-RF depends, at least partially, on progesterone acting on an oestrogen-primed pituitary gland. The concentrations of FSH in blood samples taken before injection of LH-RF at either 14.00 or 18.30 h of pro-oestrus were significantly greater in ovariectomized compared with those in sham-operated rats. In contrast the FSH responses, in terms of the mean maximal increments, were not significantly different in the various groups irrespective of the nature or time of operation or the time of injection of LH-RF. The FSH response to LH-RF was not appreciably altered by treatment with either oestradiol benzoate or progesterone immediately after ovariectomy although it was increased significantly by the sequential administration of oestrogen and progesterone. The significance of the findings that under certain conditions there were considerable differences between the LH and FSH responses to synthetic LH-RF is discussed with respect to the hypothesis that there is a common releasing factor for both gonadotrophins.