加强流行病学观察研究报告
观察研究
检查表
医学
概化理论
范围(计算机科学)
报告审判综合标准
梅德林
医学教育
心理学
队列研究
家庭医学
流行病学
替代医学
计算机科学
政治学
病理
法学
发展心理学
认知心理学
程序设计语言
作者
Erik B von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Stuart Pocock,Peter Christian Gøtzsche,Jan Paul Vandenbroucke
出处
期刊:Epidemiology
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2007-11-01
卷期号:18 (6): 800-804
被引量:2026
标识
DOI:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181577654
摘要
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed "Explanation and Elaboration" document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI