腹水
医学
肝硬化
胃肠病学
内科学
危险系数
回顾性队列研究
比例危险模型
队列
肝病
置信区间
作者
Nicolas Chong Lugon,Anahita Rabiee,Catherine Mezzacappa,David E. Kaplan,Tamar H. Taddei,Guadalupe García–Tsao
出处
期刊:Hepatology
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2025-07-03
卷期号:83 (4): 827-837
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/hep.0000000000001452
摘要
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Overt (clinically detectable) ascites is the most common decompensating event in cirrhosis and is associated with a high mortality. The impact of mild ascites (only detectable by imaging) remains unclear. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Retrospective cohort study in patients with cirrhosis using the Veterans Outcomes and Costs Associated with Liver Disease (VOCAL) cohort. Imaging reports at the time of diagnosis of cirrhosis were analyzed using natural language processing and classified into 3 groups: no ascites, grade 1 (G1) or mild ascites, and grade 2/3 (G2/G3) or overt ascites. Mortality was compared across the groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. A total of 41,699 patients were included in the study: 28,628 (68.7%) without ascites, 4046 (9.7%) with G1, and 6268 (15.0%) with G2/G3 ascites. Median follow-up time was 7.7 years (IQR 5.1-10.6). In patients with G1 (mild) ascites, median survival was 3.9 years (IQR 1.8-8.3), significantly lower than in those without ascites (6.5 years; IQR 3.1-12.2, p <0.0001) but significantly higher than in those with G2/G3 ascites (3.5 years; IQR 1.5-7.9, p <0.0001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the presence of any grade of ascites was associated with a higher hazard of mortality: G1 ascites (HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.44-1.57, p <0.001) and G2/G3 ascites (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.57-1.69, p <0.001). These results were consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Grade 1 (mild or subclinical) ascites is associated with poorer survival compared with no ascites and represents an intermediate prognostic stage between compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI