剑桥神经心理学测试自动电池
情景记忆
工作记忆
心理学
空间记忆
认知
神经心理学
听力学
神经心理学测验
执行职能
视觉记忆
认知测验
考试(生物学)
队列
认知心理学
发展心理学
临床心理学
医学
精神科
内科学
生物
古生物学
作者
Federica Cacciamani,Nicola Salvadori,Paolo Eusebi,Viviana Lisetti,Elisa Luchetti,Paolo Calabresi,Lucilla Parnetti
标识
DOI:10.1080/23279095.2017.1286346
摘要
The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) is a system of neuropsychological tests frequently used to track the progression of cognitive deficits in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigated test-retest reliability in seven CANTAB tests. Twenty-five MCI patients, with either AD-like or conflicting/normal cerebrospinal fluid profiles underwent three testing sessions at 6-month intervals, including the following tests: Reaction Time and Rapid Visual Information Processing (assessing attention and reaction times); Delayed Matching-to-Sample, Paired Associates Learning, Spatial Recognition Memory and Pattern Recognition Memory (assessing memory); Spatial Working Memory (assessing executive functions). No significant difference was found when comparing the two groups. Many CANTAB measures obtained low or marginal test-retest coefficients. We observed a marked improvement in Spatial Working Memory (SWM) in both groups when comparing the baseline performance with the 6-month follow-up, but no difference in performance between 6- and 12-month follow-ups. A similar trend was documented in Paired Associates Learning (PAL), but the effect size was small. Such improvement may result from a practice effect, likely due to the learning of an effective strategy. Our evidence raised an important issue concerning the need for methodological caution when interpreting the results of longitudinal studies using SWM and PAL.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI