Inhibition of glutathione reductase uncovers the activation of NADPH‐inhibited glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase

Abstract Eggleston and Krebs pointed to a paradox in glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) regulating process that has not yet been solved, and which originated the term “fine regulation” of G6PD and, therefore, of oxidative phase of pentose phosphate pathway (OPPP). The paradox is that, in basal‐like conditions, the activity of G6PD evaluated “in vitro” is very low or nearly null because of the potent inhibiting effect exerted by NADPH, a coenzyme whose concentration in the cell is much higher than that of the substrate NADP + . However, “in vivo,” flow through OPPP occurs in basal conditions. Eggleston and Krebs speculated on the possible existence of a system that would reverse the inhibition by NADPH. Such system would involve oxidized glutathione and exclude the participation of glutathione reductase (GR). The present work confirms the experimental results obtained by Eggleston and Krebs and proves that oxidized glutathione (GSSG) in the absence of NADPH is a direct inhibitor of G6PD. In the presence of GSSG, the G6PD activity recovery system suggested can be observed when GR is previously inhibited by alkylating agents. An unknown element with a molecular weight ranging between 12 and 50 kDa has been found to reverse part of G6PD inhibition by NADPH.