斯科普斯
标准化
活力
维数(图论)
科克伦图书馆
系统回顾
心理学
科学网
梅德林
认知心理学
老年学
物理医学与康复
医学
应用心理学
计算机科学
荟萃分析
数学
病理
政治学
哲学
神学
纯数学
法学
操作系统
作者
Susana López-Ortiz,Simone Lista,Saúl Peñín-Grandes,José Pinto-Fraga,Pedro L. Valenzuela,Robert Nisticò,Enzo Emanuele,Alejandro Lucı́a,Alejandro Santos‐Lozano
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2022.101640
摘要
The World Health Organization has introduced the term 'intrinsic capacity' (IC) as a marker of healthy ageing. However, controversy exists on the definition and assessment of IC. We aimed to review the definitions and methods used for the assessment of IC in older adults. In addition, we proposed a new IC scoring method.A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus and SPORTDiscus (up to February 10th, 2022) for studies assesing IC in older adults (>60 years).Thirty-three studies were included. There is overall consensus on the definition of IC as well as on its different dimensions, that is: locomotion, vitality, sensory, cognition and psychological. However, the methods for assessing each of these five dimensions differ substantially across studies and there is no consensus on the best method to compute an eventual global compound score to evaluate IC taking into account all its different dimensions.The IC represents a highly relevant clinical concept that has been unfortunately underutilized. We propose a standardization for the assessment of each dimension of IC, with a global 0 (worst) to 10 (highest) score.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI