实用主义
系统回顾
定性研究
管理科学
口译(哲学)
超越数
计算机科学
认识论
工程伦理学
心理学
数据科学
梅德林
社会学
工程类
社会科学
政治学
哲学
法学
程序设计语言
作者
Craig Lockwood,Zachary Munn,Kylie Porritt
出处
期刊:International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2015-08-11
卷期号:13 (3): 179-187
被引量:1424
标识
DOI:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000062
摘要
Qualitative synthesis informs important aspects of evidence-based healthcare, particularly within the practical decision-making contexts that health professionals work in. Of the qualitative methodologies available for synthesis, meta-aggregation is most transparently aligned with accepted conventions for the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews. Meta-aggregation is philosophically grounded in pragmatism and transcendental phenomenology. The essential characteristics of a meta-aggregative review are that the reviewer avoids re-interpretation of included studies, but instead accurately and reliably presents the findings of the included studies as intended by the original authors. This study reports on the methodology and methods of meta-aggregation within the structure of an a priori protocol and standardized frameworks for reporting of results by over-viewing the essential components of a systematic review report.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI