Biologics (mepolizumab and omalizumab) induced remission in severe asthma patients

Abstract Background Asthma remission has emerged as a potential treatment goal. This study evaluated the effectiveness of two biologics (mepolizumab/omalizumab) in achieving asthma remission. Methods This observational study included 453 severe asthma patients (41% male; mean age ± SD 55.7 ± 14.7 years) from two real‐world drug registries: the Australian Mepolizumab Registry and the Australian Xolair Registry. The composite outcome clinical remission was defined as zero exacerbations and zero oral corticosteroids during the previous 6 months assessed at 12 months and 5‐item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ‐5) ≤1 at 12 months. We also assessed clinical remission plus optimization (post‐bronchodilator FEV1 ≥80%) or stabilization (post‐bronchodilator FEV1 not greater than 5% decline from baseline) of lung function at 12 months. Sensitivity analyses explored various cut‐offs of ACQ‐5/FEV1 scores. The predictors of clinical remission were identified. Results 29.3% (73/249) of AMR and 22.8% (37/162) of AXR cohort met the criteria for clinical remission. When lung function criteria were added, the remission rates were reduced to 25.2% and 19.1%, respectively. Sensitivity analyses identified that the remission rate ranged between 18.1% and 34.9% in the AMR cohort and 10.6% and 27.2% in the AXR cohort. Better lung function, lower body mass index, mild disease and absence of comorbidities such as obesity, depression and osteoporosis predicted the odds of achieving clinical remission. Conclusion Biologic treatment with mepolizumab or omalizumab for severe asthma‐induced asthma remission in a subgroup of patients. Remission on treatment may be an achievable treatment target and future studies should consider remission as an outcome measure.