The Aspergillus galactomannan Ag VIRCLIA® Monotest and the sõna Aspergillus galactomannan lateral flow assay show comparable performance for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis

BACKGROUND: Rapid galactomannan tests, such as the sõna Aspergillus GM Lateral Flow Assay (GM-LFA) and the Aspergillus Galactomannan Ag VIRCLIA® Monotest (GM-Monotest), which are suitable for the analysis of single samples, have the potential to accelerate diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA). OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of the GM-Monotest and the GM-LFA for the diagnosis of IA. PATIENTS/METHODS: Two patient cohorts were analysed: adults who had received an allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplant (alloHSCT-cohort) and patients with proven/probable IA from a 5-year period (cross-sectional IA-cohort). In the alloHSCT-cohort, weekly serum samples were tested, whereas in the cross-sectional IA-cohort sera and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were analysed. The diagnostic performance was calculated using two definitions for positivity: (1) a single positive GM result and (2) at least two positive GM results from consecutive samples. IA classification followed EORTC/MSG 2019. RESULTS: The alloHSCT-cohort included 101 patients. Four had proven/probable IA, 26 possible IA and 71 no IA. The specificity for one positive serum and two consecutively positive sera was 88.7% and 100% (GM-Monotest) and 85.9% and 98.6% (GM-LFA). Comparison of ROC curves in the alloHSCT-cohort showed no significant difference. The cross-sectional IA-cohort included 59 patients with proven/probable IA. The sensitivity for one positive sample and two consecutively positive samples was 83.1% and 55.1% (GM-Monotest) and 86.4% and 71.4% (GM-LFA). CONCLUSIONS: Both assays showed comparable diagnostic performance with a higher sensitivity for the GM-LFA if two consecutive positive samples were required for positivity. However, due to poor reproducibility, positive GM-LFA results should always be confirmed.