Comparison of ionizable lipids for lipid nanoparticle mediated DNA delivery

• DNA delivery via lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations is underexplored. • Our study combines DNA expression plasmids with clinically used ionizable lipids. • In vivo biodistribution and expression are not reliably predicted by physicochemical and in vitro characteristics. • Zebrafish were used as a vertebrate bridging model to extrapolate from in vitro to the in vivo situation. • LNP formulations were identified, which lead to luciferase gene expression in wildtype mice. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are successfully used for RNA-based gene delivery. In the context of gene replacement therapies, however, delivery of DNA expression plasmids using LNPs as a non-viral vector could be a promising strategy for the induction of longer-lasting effects. Therefore, DNA expression plasmids (3 to 4 kbp) coding for fluorescent markers or luciferase were combined with LNPs. Different clinically used ionizable lipids (DLin-MC3-DMA, SM-102, and ALC-0315) were tested to compare their influence on DNA plasmid delivery. DNA-LNPs were characterized with respect to their colloidal properties (size, polydispersity, ζ-potential, morphology), in vitro performance (cellular uptake, DNA delivery, and gene expression), and in vivo characteristics (biodistribution and luciferase gene expression). At an optimized N/P ratio of 6, spherical, small and monodisperse particles with anionic ζ-potential were obtained. Efficient transgene expression was achieved with a minimum amount of 1 pg DNA per initially plated cells. Zebrafish studies allowed selection of DNA-LNPs, which demonstrated prolonged blood circulation, avoidance of macrophage clearance, and vascular extravasation. Our comparative study demonstrates a high impact of the ionizable lipid type on DNA-LNP performance. Superior transfection efficiency of DNA-LNPs containing the ionizable lipid ALC-0315 was confirmed in wildtype mice.