Accuracy of Full-Arch Intraoral Scans Versus Conventional Impression: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis and a Proposal to Standardise the Analysis of the Accuracy

医学 荟萃分析 塞雷克 工作流程 诊断准确性 出版偏见 平均差 协议(科学) 统计 口腔正畸科 医学物理学 牙科 置信区间 放射科 计算机科学 病理 数学 内科学 陶瓷 复合材料 数据库 材料科学 替代医学
作者
Paolo Pesce,Paolo Nicolini,Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio,Piero Antonio Zecca,Luigi Canullo,Gaetano Isola,Domenico Baldi,Nicola De Angelis,María Menini
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Medicine [MDPI AG]
卷期号:14 (1): 71-71 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.3390/jcm14010071
摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically revise the state of art of the accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in clinical full-arch scenarios. Methods: Electronic and manual searches were conducted up to December 2024. Only trials comparing the accuracy of digital versus conventional impressions were selected by two independent reviewers. Accuracy was evaluated by analysing the fit of the prostheses obtained through conventional workflows and those obtained from digital workflows using intraoral scanners. Alternatively, accuracy was assessed by comparing the standard tessellation language data acquired from intraoral scanning with those obtained from scanning the physical model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool the mean differences from the included studies, with heterogeneity tested by Cochran’s Q test and quantified by the I2 index. Results: We included 9 relevant studies from a total of 2535 identified studies. The risk of bias was evaluated as low, and the main results of all the included articles reported similar accuracy between digital and conventional impressions. Random effects meta-analysis resulted in a pooled mean difference of 152.46 (95% C.I. = 76.46–228.46, p-value < 0.001, I2 = 93.48%). Conclusions: In conclusion, the results of the present systematic review reveal contradictory findings regarding the accuracy of digital impressions. However, most studies analysing the clinical performance of prostheses obtained through digital impressions suggest that their accuracy falls within clinically acceptable thresholds. Future research should report comparable outcomes and focus attention on linear deviations, comparing differences between conventional and digital impressions not in absolute terms, but relative to the distance measured.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
断笔画沧桑完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
玄天明月发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
黄宇航完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
李健的小迷弟应助clathrin采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
丫鸡彦祖发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
huang发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Khan发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Lig发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
4秒前
胡图图啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
晚安完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
potatoo1984发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
NexusExplorer应助hhedaxia123采纳,获得10
6秒前
缓慢老鼠发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
进取拼搏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
风趣尔丝完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
晚安发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
如风发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
wy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科目三应助卢珈馨采纳,获得10
8秒前
rong完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
止咳宝发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6052358
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7867065
关于积分的说明 16274487
捐赠科研通 5197889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2781169
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1764112
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1645942