Accuracy of Full-Arch Intraoral Scans Versus Conventional Impression: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis and a Proposal to Standardise the Analysis of the Accuracy

医学 荟萃分析 塞雷克 工作流程 诊断准确性 出版偏见 平均差 协议(科学) 统计 口腔正畸科 医学物理学 牙科 置信区间 放射科 计算机科学 病理 数学 内科学 陶瓷 复合材料 数据库 材料科学 替代医学
作者
Paolo Pesce,Paolo Nicolini,Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio,Piero Antonio Zecca,Luigi Canullo,Gaetano Isola,Domenico Baldi,Nicola De Angelis,María Menini
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Medicine [MDPI AG]
卷期号:14 (1): 71-71 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.3390/jcm14010071
摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically revise the state of art of the accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in clinical full-arch scenarios. Methods: Electronic and manual searches were conducted up to December 2024. Only trials comparing the accuracy of digital versus conventional impressions were selected by two independent reviewers. Accuracy was evaluated by analysing the fit of the prostheses obtained through conventional workflows and those obtained from digital workflows using intraoral scanners. Alternatively, accuracy was assessed by comparing the standard tessellation language data acquired from intraoral scanning with those obtained from scanning the physical model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool the mean differences from the included studies, with heterogeneity tested by Cochran’s Q test and quantified by the I2 index. Results: We included 9 relevant studies from a total of 2535 identified studies. The risk of bias was evaluated as low, and the main results of all the included articles reported similar accuracy between digital and conventional impressions. Random effects meta-analysis resulted in a pooled mean difference of 152.46 (95% C.I. = 76.46–228.46, p-value < 0.001, I2 = 93.48%). Conclusions: In conclusion, the results of the present systematic review reveal contradictory findings regarding the accuracy of digital impressions. However, most studies analysing the clinical performance of prostheses obtained through digital impressions suggest that their accuracy falls within clinically acceptable thresholds. Future research should report comparable outcomes and focus attention on linear deviations, comparing differences between conventional and digital impressions not in absolute terms, but relative to the distance measured.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
朴素海亦发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
tlea关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
天天快乐应助犹豫代秋采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
伽古拉40k完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
阿萨德发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
SusanLites应助我本人lrx采纳,获得30
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
Bella发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
RS6完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
vanessa发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
gsit发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
文静茗茗完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
年轻的钢笔完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
小马甲应助Daisy采纳,获得10
10秒前
zz完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
刘蕊发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Feren发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
窦鞅完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
乐乐应助知性的初翠采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
ZDSHI完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
17秒前
nanxun完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
下雨不愁发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
liu11发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Feren完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
lilili完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
23秒前
啦啦啦蛤蛤蛤完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
26秒前
suicone完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
红脸蛋小星星完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
陈坤完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6029417
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7699913
关于积分的说明 16190209
捐赠科研通 5176651
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2770197
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753495
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639245