亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Accuracy of Full-Arch Intraoral Scans Versus Conventional Impression: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis and a Proposal to Standardise the Analysis of the Accuracy

医学 荟萃分析 塞雷克 工作流程 诊断准确性 出版偏见 平均差 协议(科学) 统计 口腔正畸科 医学物理学 牙科 置信区间 放射科 计算机科学 病理 数学 内科学 陶瓷 复合材料 数据库 材料科学 替代医学
作者
Paolo Pesce,Paolo Nicolini,Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio,Piero Antonio Zecca,Luigi Canullo,Gaetano Isola,Domenico Baldi,Nicola De Angelis,María Menini
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Medicine [MDPI AG]
卷期号:14 (1): 71-71 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.3390/jcm14010071
摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically revise the state of art of the accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in clinical full-arch scenarios. Methods: Electronic and manual searches were conducted up to December 2024. Only trials comparing the accuracy of digital versus conventional impressions were selected by two independent reviewers. Accuracy was evaluated by analysing the fit of the prostheses obtained through conventional workflows and those obtained from digital workflows using intraoral scanners. Alternatively, accuracy was assessed by comparing the standard tessellation language data acquired from intraoral scanning with those obtained from scanning the physical model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool the mean differences from the included studies, with heterogeneity tested by Cochran’s Q test and quantified by the I2 index. Results: We included 9 relevant studies from a total of 2535 identified studies. The risk of bias was evaluated as low, and the main results of all the included articles reported similar accuracy between digital and conventional impressions. Random effects meta-analysis resulted in a pooled mean difference of 152.46 (95% C.I. = 76.46–228.46, p-value < 0.001, I2 = 93.48%). Conclusions: In conclusion, the results of the present systematic review reveal contradictory findings regarding the accuracy of digital impressions. However, most studies analysing the clinical performance of prostheses obtained through digital impressions suggest that their accuracy falls within clinically acceptable thresholds. Future research should report comparable outcomes and focus attention on linear deviations, comparing differences between conventional and digital impressions not in absolute terms, but relative to the distance measured.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lucas应助Wenyilong采纳,获得10
3秒前
8秒前
27秒前
Wenyilong发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
34秒前
不安的毛巾关注了科研通微信公众号
54秒前
天雨流芳完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
absb发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Hello应助HenryChan采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
清甯发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
虚心沂完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
斯文问芙发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
pingyy发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
小鸟芋圆露露完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
yummm完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Chloe完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
uikymh完成签到 ,获得积分0
3分钟前
3分钟前
隐形曼青应助2368372311采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
个性凡儿完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
6wdhw完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
斯文问芙完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
ding应助Wenyilong采纳,获得10
3分钟前
瓦尔完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
LZX完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
和谐青文完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Bandwidth Choice for Bias Estimators in Dynamic Nonlinear Panel Models 2000
HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE CMOS IMAGE SENSORS FOR LOW LIGHT APPLICATIONS 1500
Constitutional and Administrative Law 1000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 530
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5356776
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4488493
关于积分的说明 13972222
捐赠科研通 4389480
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2411599
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1404108
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1378147