已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Two Commonly Used Sedation Regimens for Endoscopy

作者
William C. Palmer,Neal M. Patel,Kenneth R. DeVault
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:106: S517-S517
标识
DOI:10.14309/00000434-201110002-01351
摘要

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether differences exist in patient satisfaction between groups receiving fentanyl/midazolam and those receiving meperidine/midazolam for general endoscopy conscious sedation. Methods: In this prospective study, answers to the 20 question Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) were collected from 198 patients who received either fentanyl/midazolam (N=91) or meperidine/midazolam (N=107) during endoscopy. The total score, sedation delivery subscale score, procedure recall subscale score, sedation side effects subscale score, and global satisfaction subscale score were calculated according to the PSSI guidelines, where higher scores indicate increased satisfaction. Patient characteristics and endoscopy information were compared between fentanyl/midazolam and meperidine/midazolam groups using Fisher's exact test or a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The distribution of patient age, gender, and interventions were relatively similar between fentanyl/midazolam and meperidine/midazolam groups. There were two significant differences in PSSI responses between the two groups. Patients in the meperidine/midazolam group were more often “very satisfied” with the length of time they felt the effects of the sedation (77% vs. 65%, P=0.048). Also, patients in the meperidine/midazolam group responded “very satisfied” more often regarding how they would compare their satisfaction with this experience to their previous experience with endoscopy (86% vs. 71%, P=0.014). In the PSSI subscale scores between the two sedation groups, results were similar except for the sedation delivery subscale score, which was significantly higher in meperidine/midazolam patients compared to fentanyl/midazolam patients (P=0.034). The sedation delivery subscale score incorporated several questions including ease of medication administration and pain associated with delivery. Conclusion: In this prospective study, we utilized the PSSI, which has previously been externally validated, to compare patient satisfaction with sedation between two groups who received commonly administered regimens. We observed that patients were overall satisfied with sedation in both groups. However, there were several questions for which patients who received meperidine/midazolam were more satisfied than patients who received fentanyl/midazolam, where differences either reached statistical significance or trended toward significance.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
有点鸭梨呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
酚蓝8809完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
多多完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小小乔完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
俭朴朝雪发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
爱笑的芝麻完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
7秒前
榴莲姑娘完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
小新完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
酚蓝8803完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
乐乐应助江子川采纳,获得10
10秒前
优秀的小熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
14秒前
美好随阴发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
YPP完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
迷人白桃完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
明捷发布了新的文献求助20
19秒前
guoyu发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
molihuakai应助俭朴的红牛采纳,获得10
21秒前
张欢馨应助凤凰山采纳,获得10
21秒前
炜大的我应助111采纳,获得10
23秒前
谢同学发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
pursue完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
阿南完成签到 ,获得积分0
29秒前
乐乐应助Geralt采纳,获得10
30秒前
失眠呆呆鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
ding应助美好随阴采纳,获得10
31秒前
明捷完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
江子川发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
jokerhoney完成签到,获得积分0
34秒前
36秒前
27完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
43秒前
江子川发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
英姑应助ding采纳,获得10
50秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching 750
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Governing Growth: Us Industrial Policy from Hamilton to Trump 500
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7626191
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9201001
关于积分的说明 19727577
捐赠科研通 7196950
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3273785
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2435949
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2269734