A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Two Commonly Used Sedation Regimens for Endoscopy

作者
William C. Palmer,Neal M. Patel,Kenneth R. DeVault
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:106: S517-S517
标识
DOI:10.14309/00000434-201110002-01351
摘要

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether differences exist in patient satisfaction between groups receiving fentanyl/midazolam and those receiving meperidine/midazolam for general endoscopy conscious sedation. Methods: In this prospective study, answers to the 20 question Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) were collected from 198 patients who received either fentanyl/midazolam (N=91) or meperidine/midazolam (N=107) during endoscopy. The total score, sedation delivery subscale score, procedure recall subscale score, sedation side effects subscale score, and global satisfaction subscale score were calculated according to the PSSI guidelines, where higher scores indicate increased satisfaction. Patient characteristics and endoscopy information were compared between fentanyl/midazolam and meperidine/midazolam groups using Fisher's exact test or a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The distribution of patient age, gender, and interventions were relatively similar between fentanyl/midazolam and meperidine/midazolam groups. There were two significant differences in PSSI responses between the two groups. Patients in the meperidine/midazolam group were more often “very satisfied” with the length of time they felt the effects of the sedation (77% vs. 65%, P=0.048). Also, patients in the meperidine/midazolam group responded “very satisfied” more often regarding how they would compare their satisfaction with this experience to their previous experience with endoscopy (86% vs. 71%, P=0.014). In the PSSI subscale scores between the two sedation groups, results were similar except for the sedation delivery subscale score, which was significantly higher in meperidine/midazolam patients compared to fentanyl/midazolam patients (P=0.034). The sedation delivery subscale score incorporated several questions including ease of medication administration and pain associated with delivery. Conclusion: In this prospective study, we utilized the PSSI, which has previously been externally validated, to compare patient satisfaction with sedation between two groups who received commonly administered regimens. We observed that patients were overall satisfied with sedation in both groups. However, there were several questions for which patients who received meperidine/midazolam were more satisfied than patients who received fentanyl/midazolam, where differences either reached statistical significance or trended toward significance.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
过眼云烟发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
hhh完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
金山发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
time光发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
欧云齐发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
sss发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
Lucas应助薄荷采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
TBASD完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
尽平梅愿完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
Cactus发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
彭于晏应助阳光万声采纳,获得10
6秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助qq采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
liushaojun完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
Hou发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
猪蹄发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
体贴茗发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
shanxing发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
上下完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
庄周完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
轮换完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
领导范儿应助chenshiyi185采纳,获得10
9秒前
欢喜的笑白完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
yy完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
内向莛发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
轮换发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7278628
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8899723
关于积分的说明 18822574
捐赠科研通 6950885
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3206922
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2377513
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2181872