医学
合并分析
外科
入射(几何)
不利影响
内窥镜检查
意向治疗分析
切除术
粘膜切除术
瓦特壶腹
普通外科
内窥镜支架置入术
荟萃分析
并发症
随机对照试验
作者
Marco Spadaccini,Gianluca Franchellucci,Matteo Colombo,Cecilia Binda,Maria Terrin,Giacomo Marcozzi,Valeria Poletti,Marta Andreozzi,Alessandro De Marco,Roberto de Sire,Daryl Ramai,Silvia Carrara,Cesare Hassan,Benedetto Mangiavillano,Alessandro Fugazza,Amrita Sethi,Carlo Fabbri,Antonio Facciorusso,Andrea Anderloni,Alessandro Repici
出处
期刊:Endoscopy
[Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
日期:2025-10-15
卷期号:58 (05): 550-561
被引量:1
摘要
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy is a viable treatment option for ampullary lesions. While many studies have reported low morbidity and acceptable outcomes, early attempts to pool data from these initial experiences have produced conflicting conclusions regarding key technical aspects. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and pooled analysis to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary lesions, identifying factors that may influence outcomes. Abstract: METHODS: Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, and Embase) were searched up to September 2024. Studies that included patients with endoscopically resected ampullary lesions were eligible. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were pooled by means of a random-effects model to obtain a proportion with 95 %CI. Subgroup analysis and univariable meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential factors affecting outcomes. Abstract: RESULTS: 61 studies (4935 lesions) published between 2002 and 2024 were analyzed. Complete resection was achieved in 85.9 % of cases, though intraductal involvement limited success. The recurrence rate was 15.2 %; however, the majority of patients (92.4 %) were managed endoscopically without surgery. The pooled adverse event rate was 30.0 %, with bleeding (12.8 %) and post-procedural pancreatitis (11.2 %) being the most common complications. Prophylactic stenting reduced pancreatitis risk, while intraductal involvement increased perforation risk. Adjunctive treatments for intraductal involvement posed an increased risk of papillary stricture. Abstract: CONCLUSION: Endoscopic papillectomy is a safe and effective treatment for ampullary lesions; however, lesions with intraductal extension pose a higher risk of incomplete resection and perforation, warranting careful evaluation of the benefit-risk balance in these cases. While prophylactic pancreatic stenting may reduce the incidence of post-procedural pancreatitis, optimizing strategies to minimize overall adverse events remains a key focus for future research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI