Real-life data comparing the efficacy of vigabatrin and oral steroids given sequentially or combined for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome

Abstract

Aims

The prognosis of Infantile epileptic spasm syndrome (IESS), relates to the underlying etiology and delay in controlling epileptic spasms. Based on the spasm-free rate, a randomized controlled trial has demonstrated the superiority of combining oral steroids and vigabatrin over oral steroids alone but confirmation in real-life conditions is mandatory.

Methods

We compared two real-life IESS cohorts: a multicenter, retrospective cohort of 40 infants treated with vigabatrin followed by a sequential (ST) addition of steroids, and a prospective, single-center cohort of 58 infants treated with an immediate combination of vigabatrin and steroids (CT).

Results

The two cohorts were similar. When the rate of spasm-free infants in the two cohorts was compared on day 14, a significant difference was observed between the ST (27,5 %) and CT cohorts (64 %) (p < 0.0004). This difference remained significant on day 30, with 55 % spasm-free patients in the ST cohort compared to 76 % in the CT cohort (p = 0.03). After the infants had received both vigabatrin and steroids, without taking into account the time point after treatment initiation, no significant difference was observed in the spasm-free rate between the two cohorts (p = 0.38).

Interpretation

Real-life data confirm the interest of combination therapy as a first-line treatment for IESS.