Comparative short‐term safety and efficacy of hypnotics: A quantitative risk–benefit analysis

期限(时间) 风险分析(工程) 医学 量子力学 物理
作者
Janet M. Y. Cheung,Hannah Scott,Alexandria Muench,Ronald R. Grunstein,Andrew D. Krystal,Dieter Riemann,Michael L. Perlis
出处
期刊:Journal of Sleep Research [Wiley]
卷期号:33 (4): e14088-e14088 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/jsr.14088
摘要

Summary Several professional societies have provided recommendations for prescribing medications for insomnia. None has provided an integrative analysis that concurrently quantifies safety and efficacy (e.g., risk–benefit ratios). This represents an important gap for informing clinician decision‐making. Accordingly, the aim of the present review is to provide such an analysis for five classes of sleep‐promoting medications. Adverse event data values were extracted from the most recent FDA‐approved package inserts and converted to an integer before being placebo‐adjusted and standardized as a rate per 1000 (AEr). Efficacy data, pre‐to‐post self‐reported data for active and placebo conditions were acquired from pivotal trials identified in “white papers” and systematic reviews/meta‐analyses. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for subjective sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset and total sleep time, and then were averaged by medication class for each sleep continuity variable. Overall efficacy was represented by a single variable, SWT (sleep latency + wake time after sleep onset + total sleep time). Risk–benefit was represented using a simple ratio value. For safety, it was found that melatonin receptor agonists had the lowest adverse event rate (AEr = 43.1), and non‐benzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists had the highest rate (AEr = 255.0). For efficacy, it was found that the pre‐to‐post placebo adjusted effect sizes were largest for benzodiazepines (effect size = 1.94) and smallest for melatonin receptor agonists (effect size = 0.109). For risk–benefit, histamine antagonist had the most favourable profile (risk–benefit = 69.5), while melatonin receptor agonist had the least favourable profile (risk–benefit = 395.7). Overall, the combined metric for risk–benefit suggests that treatment with a histamine antagonist is optimal and potentially represents the best first‐line therapy for the medical management of insomnia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
叽里咕噜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
大气的杨发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
zhaoweijava2019完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
七七发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
白衣轻叹发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
wanci应助ymmmjjd采纳,获得10
3秒前
llll发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
蟹黄小笼包完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
情怀应助linshunan采纳,获得10
4秒前
飞儿完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
cloudss完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
完美世界应助a海w采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
自由的语柳完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
dx3906发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
春风寒完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
tomcruise发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4应助宋向荣采纳,获得10
13秒前
桉_发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
DODO完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
科研通AI6.2应助xmn采纳,获得30
15秒前
16秒前
18秒前
tttt完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
在水一方应助迷路夏山采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
llll发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
LZX发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
英俊的铭应助白术采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
科科发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching 750
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 500
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in Digital Age? Technology, AI Bots, and Psychotherapy after Covid 444
煤炭地下气化渗流燃烧方法的研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7632140
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9206585
关于积分的说明 19745169
捐赠科研通 7201514
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3274756
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2436666
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2271440