Comparative short‐term safety and efficacy of hypnotics: A quantitative risk–benefit analysis

期限(时间) 风险分析(工程) 医学 量子力学 物理
作者
Janet M. Y. Cheung,Hannah Scott,Alexandria Muench,Ronald R. Grunstein,Andrew D. Krystal,Dieter Riemann,Michael L. Perlis
出处
期刊:Journal of Sleep Research [Wiley]
卷期号:33 (4): e14088-e14088 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/jsr.14088
摘要

Summary Several professional societies have provided recommendations for prescribing medications for insomnia. None has provided an integrative analysis that concurrently quantifies safety and efficacy (e.g., risk–benefit ratios). This represents an important gap for informing clinician decision‐making. Accordingly, the aim of the present review is to provide such an analysis for five classes of sleep‐promoting medications. Adverse event data values were extracted from the most recent FDA‐approved package inserts and converted to an integer before being placebo‐adjusted and standardized as a rate per 1000 (AEr). Efficacy data, pre‐to‐post self‐reported data for active and placebo conditions were acquired from pivotal trials identified in “white papers” and systematic reviews/meta‐analyses. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for subjective sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset and total sleep time, and then were averaged by medication class for each sleep continuity variable. Overall efficacy was represented by a single variable, SWT (sleep latency + wake time after sleep onset + total sleep time). Risk–benefit was represented using a simple ratio value. For safety, it was found that melatonin receptor agonists had the lowest adverse event rate (AEr = 43.1), and non‐benzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists had the highest rate (AEr = 255.0). For efficacy, it was found that the pre‐to‐post placebo adjusted effect sizes were largest for benzodiazepines (effect size = 1.94) and smallest for melatonin receptor agonists (effect size = 0.109). For risk–benefit, histamine antagonist had the most favourable profile (risk–benefit = 69.5), while melatonin receptor agonist had the least favourable profile (risk–benefit = 395.7). Overall, the combined metric for risk–benefit suggests that treatment with a histamine antagonist is optimal and potentially represents the best first‐line therapy for the medical management of insomnia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
ZZzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
maun222完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
鳖鳖完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
专一的书雪完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
奔腾小马完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
可靠映秋完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
欣欣完成签到 ,获得积分0
7秒前
犹豫大树完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
xz完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
常常完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
lebangzhanshi完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
感动花卷发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
斐波拉切土豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
从不内卷完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
xx完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
酷波er应助执着书瑶采纳,获得10
14秒前
cdercder应助可靠的南露采纳,获得10
16秒前
标致的泥猴桃完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
TianFuAI完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
布拉德皮特厚完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
冷静的马里奥完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
不吃葱花行不行完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
鸢雨情笺完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
Guorsh完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
yqwrr发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
木子李完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Lucas应助在时光的秋千上采纳,获得10
23秒前
李安全完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
宝石山完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
xwj完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Lucas应助影子采纳,获得10
28秒前
善良的冰绿完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
兜里面有怪兽完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les chinois de jakarta: temples et vie collective 1000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
基于锂离子电池正极材料回收的绿色溶剂开发及工程化应用研究 800
Social Psychology 600
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7646173
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9218446
关于积分的说明 19778239
捐赠科研通 7210540
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3276969
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2438624
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2275032