奇纳
医学
度量(数据仓库)
梅德林
心理干预
老年学
物理疗法
物理医学与康复
计算机科学
数据挖掘
精神科
政治学
法学
作者
Nienke M. de Vries,J. Bart Staal,C.D. van Ravensberg,Hans Hobbelen,Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert,Maria W. G. Nijhuis–van der Sanden
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001
摘要
Frailty is one of the greatest challenges for healthcare professionals. The level of frailty depends on several interrelated factors and can change over time while different interventions seem to be able to influence the level of frailty. Therefore, an outcome instrument to measure frailty with sound clinimetric properties is needed. A systematic review on evaluative measures of frailty was performed in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl and Cochrane. The results show numerous instruments that measure the level of frailty. This article gives a clear overview of the content of these frailty instruments and describes their clinimetric properties. Frailty instruments, however, are often developed as prognostic instruments and have also been validated as such. The clinimetric properties of these instruments as evaluative outcome measures are unclear.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI