计算机科学
数据科学
定性研究
社会学
管理科学
生成语法
民族志
大数据
认识论
工程伦理学
能力(人力资源)
读写能力
类型学
计算社会学
定性性质
科学素养
教育研究
社会研究
人工智能
社会模拟
定性推理
认知科学
日常生活
社会理论
计算模型
计算思维
新兴技术
社会科学
社会问题
科学知识社会学
研究计划
作者
Corey M. Abramson,Tara Prendergast,Zhuofan Li,Daniel Dohan
标识
DOI:10.1146/annurev-soc-011824-104836
摘要
Computational developments—particularly artificial intelligence—are reshaping social scientific research and raising new questions for in-depth methods such as ethnography and qualitative interviewing. Building on classic debates about computers in qualitative data analysis, we revisit possibilities and dangers in an era of automation, large language model chatbots, and big data. We introduce a typology of contemporary approaches to using computers in qualitative research: streamlining workflows, scaling up projects, hybrid analytical methods, the sociology of computation, and technological rejection. Drawing from scaled team ethnographies and solo research integrating computational social science alongside in-depth observation, we describe methodological choices across study life cycles, from literature reviews through data collection, coding, text retrieval, and representation. We argue that new technologies hold potential to address long-standing methodological challenges when deployed with knowledge, purpose, and ethical commitment. Yet, a pragmatic approach—moving beyond technological optimism and dismissal—is essential given rapidly changing tools that are both generative and dangerous. Computation now saturates research infrastructure, from algorithmic literature searches to scholarly metrics, making computational literacy a core methodological competence in and beyond sociology. We conclude that when used carefully and transparently, contemporary computational tools can meaningfully expand, rather than displace, the irreducible insights of qualitative research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI