Validation of the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System Treatment Algorithm

医学 算法 脊柱(分子生物学) 生物信息学 计算机科学 生物
作者
Mark J. Lambrechts,Gregory D. Schroeder,Khoa S. Tran,Sandy Li,Angela Huang,Justin Chu,Brian A. Karamian,José A. Canseco,Alan S. Hilibrand,F. Cumhur Öner,Marcel F. Dvorak,Klaus J. Schnake,Christopher K. Kepler,Alexander R. Vaccaro
出处
期刊:Spine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:48 (14): 994-1002
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000004693
摘要

Study Design. Retrospective Cohort Study. Objective. To determine how historical management of thoracolumbar spine injuries compares to the recently proposed AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System treatment algorithm. Summary of Background Data. Classifications of the thoracolumbar spine are not uncommon. The frequent advent of new classifications is typically due to previous classifications being primarily descriptive or unreliable. Thus, AO Spine created a classification with an associated treatment algorithm to guide injury classification and management. Methods. Thoracolumbar spine injuries were retrospectively identified from a prospectively collected spine trauma database at a single, urban, academic medical center during the years 2006 to 2021. Each injury was classified and assigned points based on the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System injury severity score. Patients were grouped into scores of 3 or less (preferred initial conservative treatment) and greater than 6 (preferred initial surgical intervention). Either operative or non-operative treatment was considered appropriate for injury severity scores of 4 or 5. Results. A total of 815 patients (TL AOSIS 0-3: 486, TL AOSIS 4-5: 150, TL AOSIS 6+: 179) met inclusion status. Injury severity scores of 0-3 were more likely to undergo non-operative management compared to scores of 4-5 or 6+ (99.0% vs. 74.7% vs. 13.4%, P <0.001). Thus, guideline congruent treatment was 99.0%, 100%, and 86.6%, respectively ( P <0.001). Most injuries determined to be a 4 or 5 were treated non-operatively (74.7%). Based on the treatment algorithm, 97.5% of patients who received operative treatment and 96.1% who received non-operative treatment were managed in accordance with the algorithm. Of the 29 patients who did not receive algorithm congruent treatment, 5 (17.2%) were treated surgically. Conclusions. A retrospective review of thoracolumbar spine injuries at our urban academic medical center identified that patients are historically treated in accordance with the proposed AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System treatment algorithm.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
顾矜应助清脆半双采纳,获得30
刚刚
Hello应助楼下太吵了采纳,获得10
2秒前
5秒前
7秒前
斯文败类应助美好忆之采纳,获得10
8秒前
10秒前
13秒前
15秒前
16秒前
19秒前
清脆半双发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
崔京成完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
美好忆之发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
呆萌的蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
悦耳的襄发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
磊大彪完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
无语的成仁完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Stamina678完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
傲寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
乐观的小鸡完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
石慧君完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
MS903完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
hzs完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
LIJIngcan完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
布卡约萨卡完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
大雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
清脆半双完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
艳艳宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
47秒前
小陈完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
美好忆之完成签到,获得积分20
48秒前
哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
Orange应助大恶魔宝拉采纳,获得10
54秒前
Xu完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
寒冷的月亮完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
英姑应助橙子采纳,获得30
57秒前
58秒前
leo完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
勤奋的白桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6440910
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8254766
关于积分的说明 17572167
捐赠科研通 5499172
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2900113
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1876725
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1716926