CT-derived fractional flow reserve on therapeutic management and outcomes compared with coronary CT angiography in coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of on-site deep learning-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for therapeutic management and adverse clinical outcomes in patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) alone. METHODS: This single-centre prospective study included consecutive patients suspected of CAD between June 2021 and September 2021 at our hospital. Four hundred and sixty-one patients were randomized into either CT-FFR+CCTA or CCTA-alone group. The first endpoint was the invasive coronary angiography (ICA) efficiency, defined as the ICA with nonobstructive disease (stenosis <50%) and the ratio of revascularization to ICA (REV-to-ICA ratio) within 90 days. The second endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiaovascular events (MACE) at 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients (267 [57.9%] men; median age, 64 [55-69]) were included. At 90 days, the rate of ICA with nonobstructive disease in the CT-FFR+CCTA group was lower than in the CCTA group (14.7% vs 34.0%, P=.047). The REV-to-ICA ratio in the CT-FFR+CCTA group was significantly higher than in the CCTA group (73.5% vs. 50.9%, P=.036). No significant difference in ICA efficiency was found in intermediate stenosis (25%-69%) between the 2 groups (all P>.05). After a median follow-up of 23 (22-24) months, MACE were observed in 11 patients in the CT-FFR+CCTA group and 24 in the CCTA group (5.9% vs 10.0%, P=.095). CONCLUSIONS: The on-site deep learning-based CT-FFR improved the efficiency of ICA utilization with a similarly low rate of MACE compared with CCTA alone. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The on-site deep learning-based CT-FFR was superior to CCTA for therapeutic management.