自身抗体
医学
溃疡性结肠炎
血清学
内科学
胃肠病学
诊断准确性
前瞻性队列研究
逻辑回归
疾病
抗体
免疫学
炎症性肠病
多元分析
抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体
结肠炎
试验预测值
免疫病理学
诊断试验中的似然比
生物标志物
潘卡
疾病严重程度
克罗恩病
病例对照研究
作者
Samuel Truniger,David Waber,Joel Dütschler,Marius König,Jakob Heimer,Peter Schönenberger,Seraina Koller,Isabelle Kamm,Regine García Boy,Christina Lins,Claudia Krieger‐Grübel,Nicola Frei,Simon Woelfel,Matthias Friedrich,Alfred Mahr,Stephan Brand
摘要
ABSTRACT Background Reliable biomarkers to distinguish ulcerative colitis (UC) from Crohn's disease (CD) remain limited. Aims To assess the diagnostic accuracy of anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies for differentiating UC from CD and to compare their performance with anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) and anti‐ Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA). Methods In this prospective cross‐sectional study in patients with UC and CD, serum anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies, ASCA, and ANCA were measured and clinical data were collected. The primary outcome was the accuracy of anti‐integrin αvβ6 antibodies in distinguishing UC from CD. Secondary analyses compared their performance with ASCA and ANCA status and across IBD subgroups. Results A total of 224 patients were included (UC: n = 106, CD: n = 118, male: 63.8%, median age: 43.5 years). Patients with indeterminate colitis were excluded. At a cut‐off of 2.44 U/mL, anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 86.5%, with a sensitivity of 85.8% and specificity of 87.1%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, these autoantibodies were independently associated with UC (OR 36.18, 95% CI 17.0–83.0, p = 4.86 × 10 −19 ) and demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to ANCA and ASCA status (Akaike information criterion 184.8 vs. 252.4). Positivity rates followed a gradient across the Montreal classification, increasing from ileal (L1: 7.9%) and ileocolonic (L3: 8.1%) CD towards colonic CD (L2: 43.8%) and UC: 85.8% ( p = 2.04 × 10 −31 ). Conclusions Anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and outperform conventional serological markers in distinguishing UC from CD. Importantly, this study provides the first direct comparison with ANCA and ASCA status within the same patient cohort.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI