同行反馈
就业能力
心理学
质量(理念)
同行评估
感知
医学教育
印为红字的
焦点小组
同行评价
同行评审
数学教育
高等教育
教育学
医学
认识论
哲学
业务
营销
神经科学
法学
政治学
标识
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2019.1697424
摘要
Peer review in the classroom can enhance numerous employability skills such as critical appraisal, writing skills, reflection practices and collaborative experiences. This study takes place over two years and discusses the implementation of a repeating blind peer review cycle across a single semester for final year chemistry students enrolled on a compulsory employability module. The feedback cycle promotes personal reflection through the use of mini-reflective questionnaires. The process was assessed by academic tutors at the resubmission stage and/or the peer feedback stage where the quality of peer feedback was directly assessed. The research investigates the quality of peer feedback, the importance of assessment and student perceptions of what is most useful. Methods include directed content analysis of feedback produced, student opinions and a focus group. Students were capable of offering useable feedback across a range of assessment criteria but tend to focus on the important criteria best aligned to the particular assignment. A range of motivational factors and tactics were noticed but students tended to find reviewing the most beneficial.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI