The long‐term ICU patient: Which definition?

Abstract Aims and objectives To offer a review of the differing terminologies used by clinicians and researchers to describe the long‐term intensive care unit (ICU) patient and the underlying propositions that align with this terminology. Background Ongoing medical and technological advances in emergency and intensive care have resulted in improved survival of critically ill patients in recent decades. In addition, these advancements have also resulted in improved survival of complex critically ill patients who progress to a trajectory of prolonged critical illness, having protracted stays in the ICU. There is great variability in terminology used to define the long‐term ICU patient. This lack of a common definition for long‐term ICU patients is problematic, increasing their vulnerability and risk of care not being centred about their unique needs. Design In this discursive article, we explore the terminology used to define the long‐term ICU patient. An initial broad search of the literature across four electronic databases was conducted to identify common terminology used to define the long‐term ICU patient. From here, seven definitions were identified and chosen for inclusion in the review as they meet inclusion criteria and clearly described a group of patients who have an extended ICU stay. The seven selected terms are as follows: prolonged mechanical ventilation; failure to wean; insertion of tracheostomy; chronically critically ill; persistent critical illness; persistent inflammatory‐immunosuppressive and catabolic syndrome; and frailty. Following this a focused review of the literature with the selected terms was conducted to explore in greater detail the terminology. Discussion The lack of clear definition for this patient group can potentiate their care needs being unmet. Acknowledgement of the need to clearly define this patient group is the first step to improve outcomes. Nursing is well positioned to recognise the different terminologies use to describe this group of patients and implement care to suit their unique clinical characteristics. Conclusion and Relevance to Clinical Practice Recognition and standardisation of these terms are an important priority to pave the way to improve care pathways and outcomes for this group of patients and their family.