斯特罗普效应
有氧运动
考试(生物学)
认知
心理学
人口
物理疗法
试制试验
医学
物理医学与康复
认知障碍
精神科
生物
环境卫生
古生物学
作者
Allan Shook,Joshua A. Logan,Toria A. Crispin
标识
DOI:10.1249/01.mss.0000538586.05681.14
摘要
A strong connection between physical activity and cognition has been well documented in health science. Prior research suggests a strong relationship between both aerobic exercise training and slow-controlled resistance training with improvements in cognitive function (CF). Little research exists on the influence of high-force production (ballistic) strength training on CF. PURPOSE: To determine the effects of ballistic strength training on CF in an apparently healthy, college-aged population. METHODS: 21 low-risk participants (age 18-25 years) who had refrained from any ballistic strength training for at least six months were recruited to the treatment group. 19 individuals (age 18-25 years) served as controls. Treatment and control groups continued previous aerobic and traditional (slow-controlled) resistance training during the study. Both groups completed congruent (CONG) and incongruent (INCONG) sections of The Stroop Test, and the Trail Making Test, Part B (TMT-B), at baseline, and eight weeks later. The Stroop Test assessed the number of correct answers on CONG and INCONG questions and the completion time of the test. The TMT-B measured the correct completion time of the test. The treatment group met twice weekly for eight weeks and completed a ballistic training protocol. Pre- and post-test comparisons within and between subjects on CF were assessed. RESULTS: Completion time for both CONG and INCONG sections of The Stroop Test significantly improved from baseline to post-test for all participants (1.65 + 3.59, p = .006; 2.17 + 4.60, p = .005, respectively); however, there was no significant difference in between groups (F = .921, p = .847; F = 2.696, p = .450, respectively). All participants significantly improved from baseline to post-test on the TMT-B (9.74 + 10.48, p < .001); however, there was no significant difference between the treatment and control group from baseline to post-test (1.82 + 3.08, p = .564). CONCLUSION: CF improved in the treatment and control group but was not statistically different. Future research could investigate if ballistic strength training influences CF in sedentary individuals.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI