Digital cholangioscopy-guided laser versus mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stone removal after failed papillary large-balloon dilation: a randomized study

作者
Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon,Santi Kulpatcharapong,Wiriyaporn Ridtitid,Chaloemphon Boonmee,Panida Piyachaturawat,Pradermchai Kongkam,Wattana Pareesri,Rungsun Rerknimitr
出处
期刊:Endoscopy [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
卷期号:51 (11): 1066-1073 被引量:49
标识
DOI:10.1055/a-0848-8373
摘要

Abstract Background Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) allows for the complete removal of large common bile duct (CBD) stones without fragmentation; however, a significant proportion of very large stones and stones floating above a tapering CBD require lithotripsy. Mechanical lithotripsy and cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy are both effective for stone fragmentation. This study aimed to directly compare, for the first time, the efficacy of these two techniques in terms of stone clearance rate, procedure duration, patient radiation exposure, and safety. Methods 32 patients with very large CBD stones or with stones floating above a tapering CBD, and in whom extraction after standard sphincterotomy and/or EPLBD had failed, were randomly assigned to mechanical lithotripsy or cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy at two tertiary referral centers. Crossover was allowed as a rescue treatment if the assigned technique failed. Results Patients’ demographic data were not different between the two groups. Mechanical lithotripsy had a significantly lower stone clearance rate in the first session compared with laser lithotripsy (63% vs. 100%; P < 0.01). Laser lithotripsy rescued 60% of patients with failed mechanical lithotripsy by achieving complete stone clearance within the same session. Radiation exposure of patients was significantly higher in the mechanical lithotripsy group than in the laser lithotripsy group (40 745 vs. 20 989 mGycm2; P = 0.04). Adverse events (13% vs. 6%; P = 0.76) and length of hospital stay (1 vs. 1 day; P = 0.27) were not different. Conclusions Although mechanical lithotripsy is the standard of care for a very large CBD stone after failed EPLBD, where available, cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy is considered the better option for the treatment of this entity as it provides a higher success rate and lower radiation exposure.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
海螺完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
小可爱123456完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ASLYJS完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
欣喜的尔曼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
zuo20050727发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
灵灵完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
xiaoju发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小马甲应助杜玉采纳,获得10
2秒前
小蘑菇应助lihuahui采纳,获得10
2秒前
华仔应助wwd采纳,获得10
2秒前
英姑应助吉祥采纳,获得10
3秒前
Miduo完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
江茶记完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
我和狂三贴贴完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
txmjsn完成签到,获得积分0
3秒前
3秒前
miumiu完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
梦云点灯完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
DW应助悦耳的怀寒采纳,获得10
3秒前
西瓜皮嘚冬瓜皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
双硫仑完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
愉快的枕头完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
ericson发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
houlingwei完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
阳光念烟完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
jugfbj完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助du采纳,获得10
5秒前
wave完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
冷静柚子完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Amon完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
大佬发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
DW应助悦耳的怀寒采纳,获得10
7秒前
等风、也等你完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
黄澄澈完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助牛牛采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nine new races of Peronospora manshurica found on soybeans in the Midwest 1000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Eudora Welty and Modern Media 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7772904
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9315072
关于积分的说明 20342808
捐赠科研通 7358491
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3317064
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2465596
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2332165