Digital cholangioscopy-guided laser versus mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stone removal after failed papillary large-balloon dilation: a randomized study

作者
Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon,Santi Kulpatcharapong,Wiriyaporn Ridtitid,Chaloemphon Boonmee,Panida Piyachaturawat,Pradermchai Kongkam,Wattana Pareesri,Rungsun Rerknimitr
出处
期刊:Endoscopy [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
卷期号:51 (11): 1066-1073 被引量:49
标识
DOI:10.1055/a-0848-8373
摘要

Abstract Background Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) allows for the complete removal of large common bile duct (CBD) stones without fragmentation; however, a significant proportion of very large stones and stones floating above a tapering CBD require lithotripsy. Mechanical lithotripsy and cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy are both effective for stone fragmentation. This study aimed to directly compare, for the first time, the efficacy of these two techniques in terms of stone clearance rate, procedure duration, patient radiation exposure, and safety. Methods 32 patients with very large CBD stones or with stones floating above a tapering CBD, and in whom extraction after standard sphincterotomy and/or EPLBD had failed, were randomly assigned to mechanical lithotripsy or cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy at two tertiary referral centers. Crossover was allowed as a rescue treatment if the assigned technique failed. Results Patients’ demographic data were not different between the two groups. Mechanical lithotripsy had a significantly lower stone clearance rate in the first session compared with laser lithotripsy (63% vs. 100%; P < 0.01). Laser lithotripsy rescued 60% of patients with failed mechanical lithotripsy by achieving complete stone clearance within the same session. Radiation exposure of patients was significantly higher in the mechanical lithotripsy group than in the laser lithotripsy group (40 745 vs. 20 989 mGycm2; P = 0.04). Adverse events (13% vs. 6%; P = 0.76) and length of hospital stay (1 vs. 1 day; P = 0.27) were not different. Conclusions Although mechanical lithotripsy is the standard of care for a very large CBD stone after failed EPLBD, where available, cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy is considered the better option for the treatment of this entity as it provides a higher success rate and lower radiation exposure.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
情怀应助有机物采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6.2应助shizi采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
Owen应助Star-XYX采纳,获得10
3秒前
英俊的铭应助buhuihuaxue采纳,获得10
4秒前
彭于晏应助惜灵采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
夏爽2023发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
8秒前
机械腾完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
Yangshu发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Orange应助猫猫文采纳,获得10
11秒前
KWang完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
U9A完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助kklove采纳,获得10
12秒前
初晴发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
vv发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
新叶完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
YYY完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
lu完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
科研通AI6.4应助初淇采纳,获得10
17秒前
liwanr发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
你薛的对啊完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
感动发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
小旺发布了新的文献求助50
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
lillian完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
orixero应助蓝白采纳,获得10
22秒前
高高的大白菜真实的钥匙完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
WWWkk完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
新一完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7738223
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9287441
关于积分的说明 20182914
捐赠科研通 7315908
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3305820
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2458124
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2315607