Effect of concentration range on the accuracy of measuring sweetness potencies of sweeteners

作者
Won-Whi Ko,Seong-Bo Kim,Seo‐Jin Chung
出处
期刊:Food Quality and Preference [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:79: 103753-103753 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103753
摘要

The main objective of the present study was to determine the effect of the concentration range of sweetener on the accuracy of sweetness potency, defined as the ratio of target sweetener and sucrose concentrations at equivalent sweetness intensity level (Wee, Tan, & Forde, 2018), measurement. Attempts were made to measure the sweetness potencies of two bulk sweeteners (powder allulose and liquefied allulose) and three intense sweeteners (sucralose, rebaudioside A, rebaudioside D) using a sucrose-sweetener combined (SSC) method. Three sets of sample combination were evaluated in three independent descriptive analysis testing sessions. One set of sweetener samples had a sucrose-equivalent concentration (SEC) range of 2–15%, wide range condition. The other two sample sets had narrower SEC ranges, of 1–9% for the narrow-range, low-concentration condition, and 8–16% for the narrow-range, high-concentration condition. All samples were evaluated by 10 trained panelists. Reference standards for sweetness intensities were provided during the testing sessions. Overall, the predicted sweetness potency measured over the wide concentration range was less accurate than that measured over the narrower range. Additionally, the results showed that the sweetness potencies were little affected by the concentration for bulk sweeteners, while the sweetness potencies changed dramatically for intense sweeteners. The SSC method was previously proposed for reducing the contextual bias caused by a range-frequency effect during sweetness intensity measurement. However, the present study has revealed that this method is not completely free from psychological biases and that the accuracy of measuring sweetness potency can be affected by the concentration range over which the panelist is evaluating. Thus, the concentration range of sample sets that are evaluated together should be determined carefully to ensure accurate measurement of sweetness.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
兴奋以山完成签到 ,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
tingi完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
杨莹发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
梦888完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
乐游完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
谨慎青枫完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
桐桐应助人形电子示波器采纳,获得10
3秒前
SciGPT应助蛋糕采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
牙牙发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
lllllll发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
欢喜的祥发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
Jalinezz完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
寒冷安筠发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
潘杰完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
研友_ZzwoR8完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
dj完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
科目三应助ncvrt采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
子平完成签到 ,获得积分0
6秒前
蜜桃小丸子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
dandelion完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
种田完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
杨莹完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
Always完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
李定钊发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7761731
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9306636
关于积分的说明 20295691
捐赠科研通 7346258
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3313246
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2463476
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2327547