连续血糖监测
医学
血糖性
血糖自我监测
糖尿病
重症监护医学
内分泌学
作者
Guido Freckmann,Stephanie Wehrstedt,Manuel Eichenlaub,Stefan Pleus,Manuela Link,Nina Jendrike,Şükrü Öter,Derek Brandt,Cornelia Haug,Delia Waldenmaier
出处
期刊:Diabetes Care
[American Diabetes Association]
日期:2025-04-08
被引量:2
摘要
OBJECTIVE This study analyzed the differences in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics among three current-generation systems and evaluated their impact on therapeutic decision-making. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Twenty-three participants wore the FreeStyle Libre 3, Dexcom G7, and Medtronic Simplera CGM systems for 14 days in parallel. CGM metrics were calculated for each participant and CGM system separately. RESULTS The apparent glucose profile was influenced by the used CGM system, resulting in substantially different glycemic metrics among the three systems. Agreement between FreeStyle Libre 3 and Dexcom G7 was higher than with Medtronic Simplera, which showed lower glucose levels, on average. There were marked intraparticipant discrepancies that would have resulted in different therapeutic recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The CGM systems indicated discordant glycemic metrics, which should be considered in diabetes therapy. Different CGM systems should provide the same glucose readings and CGM-derived metrics when used by the same person.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI