Is it pain, anger, disgust, or sadness? Individual differences in expectations of pain facial expressions.

悲伤 厌恶 愤怒 心理学 面部表情 认知心理学 听力学 临床心理学 医学 沟通
作者
Arianne Richer,Francis Gingras,Marie‐Pier Plouffe‐Demers,Daniel Fiset,Caroline Blais
出处
期刊:Emotion [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:25 (7): 1750-1763
标识
DOI:10.1037/emo0001516
摘要

Humans rely on facial expressions to assess others' affective states. However, pain facial expressions are poorly recognized and are often confused with other negative affective states, such as anger, disgust, sadness, and fear. Previous research has shown that individuals' expectations about the appearance of pain facial expressions are not optimal and do not perfectly reflect the facial features typically observed in individuals expressing pain. In the present study, we verified if expectations about pain facial expressions are also suboptimal by overlapping with other affective states. We relied on two published data sets (data collected between 2017 and 2020) containing images representing the expectations of the appearance of pain facial expressions according to 162 White participants. We then asked an independent group of White participants (N = 60, 30 women, Mage = 31.5) to rate the degree to which they perceived the six basic emotions (anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, and surprise) and pain in those images (data collected in 2023). The same pattern of findings was obtained in both data sets. Anger, disgust, and sadness were perceived as highly salient in expectations about pain facial expressions. Most importantly, three clusters of participants with distinct expectations were found. These results support the hypothesis that individual differences exist in how observers expect pain to be expressed. These individual differences might impact the ability of an observer to distinguish an expression of pain from other negative affective states, and raising awareness about them might help reduce mistakes with serious consequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
嘛籽m完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
情怀应助青松子采纳,获得10
1秒前
koukaki完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Akim应助scx采纳,获得10
1秒前
Lucas应助小巧的代珊采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
碧蓝曼云发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
淡定的健柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
桔梗花发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
XY完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
星星气球完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
xywang发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
15秒前
16秒前
典雅的灵煌完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
善良太阳完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
arisfield完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
小费柴完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
小富完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
缓慢忆秋发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
三木发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
小二郎应助lucygaga采纳,获得10
25秒前
小美好发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
碧蓝曼云完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
27秒前
JiuYu完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
30秒前
任性飞机发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
季函发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
35秒前
inspirx完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
封似狮完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
lucygaga发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
40秒前
义气跳跳糖完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
Julie完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
ljys完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
高分求助中
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
Understanding Modeling and Simulation of Polymerization Reactions 400
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 400
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6904339
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8598162
关于积分的说明 18252743
捐赠科研通 6306954
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3063552
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2085917
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2041343