Aerobic Training With Blood Flow Restriction on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

有氧运动 荟萃分析 肌肉肥大 力量训练 血流受限 医学 物理疗法 体力 肌肉力量 内科学 阻力训练
作者
Carlos Henrique de Lemos Muller,Juliano Boufleur Farinha,Rodrigo Leal-Menezes,Thiago Rozales Ramis
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:38 (7): 1341-1349 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004800
摘要

Abstract de Lemos Muller, CH, Farinha, JB, Leal-Menezes, R, and Ramis, TR. Aerobic training with blood flow restriction on muscle hypertrophy and strength: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 38(7): 1341–1349, 2024—Integrating strength and endurance training in a single exercise session, even on separate days, can be physically demanding and time-consuming. Therefore, there is a growing interest in identifying efficient training methods that can concurrently enhance cardiovascular and neuromuscular performance through a singular training modality. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of aerobic training with blood flow restriction (AT + BFR) on muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in healthy individuals. Our study was registered at PROSPERO and used multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science), seeking clinical trials that examined AT + BFR influence on muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in individuals aged 18–60 years and comparing with aerobic training without BFR. The risk of bias and method quality were assessed using the ROB2.0 tool and PEDro scale, respectively, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE method. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, and standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for each outcome. Of 4,462 records, 29 full texts were assessed for eligibility, with 7 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that AT + BFR was more beneficial for inducing muscle hypertrophy than aerobic training without BFR (SMD [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.37–1.35]; I 2 = 42%). Furthermore, AT + BFR was associated with greater improvements in muscle strength (SMD [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.10–0.72]; I 2 = 0%). Despite the generally high risk of bias for both outcomes, these encouraging findings underscore the clinical significance of AT + BFR as a compelling tool for enhancing neuromuscular parameters.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
香蕉觅云应助Croissant采纳,获得10
3秒前
斯文的夜雪发布了新的文献求助100
3秒前
LMR完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
钟钟发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
CodeCraft应助45343采纳,获得10
6秒前
dyh完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
chelsea完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
RDQ完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
科研通AI5应助柠檬百香果采纳,获得10
10秒前
12秒前
14秒前
刻苦鼠标发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
NexusExplorer应助不安梦桃采纳,获得10
18秒前
lhappy发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
直率奇迹完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
24秒前
认真的砖头完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
lhappy完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
lvsehx完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
wanci应助devilito采纳,获得30
27秒前
南有乔木发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
科研通AI2S应助研友_nqv5WZ采纳,获得10
30秒前
MchemG应助lvsehx采纳,获得10
30秒前
32秒前
CJ发布了新的文献求助20
32秒前
33秒前
dyk完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
34秒前
微塵发布了新的文献求助70
35秒前
talpionchen完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
我是老大应助鉴湖采纳,获得10
36秒前
Alex发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
不安梦桃发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
38秒前
cc完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
科研通AI5应助daixan89采纳,获得80
41秒前
曾经可乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
42秒前
小蘑菇应助running采纳,获得10
42秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3778778
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3324343
关于积分的说明 10218037
捐赠科研通 3039436
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668089
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798545
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758437