医学
再狭窄
血管成形术
紫杉醇
气球
临床终点
药物洗脱支架
狭窄
支架
放射科
切割气球
外科
随机对照试验
化疗
作者
Robert A. Byrne,Franz–Josef Neumann,Julinda Mehilli,Susanne Pinieck,Britta Wolff,Klaus Tiroch,S. Schulz,Massimiliano Fusaro,Ilka Ott,Tareq Ibrahim,Jörg Hausleiter,Christian Valina,Jürgen Pache,Karl‐Ludwig Laugwitz,Steffen Maßberg,Adnan Kastrati
出处
期刊:The Lancet
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2012-12-01
卷期号:381 (9865): 461-467
被引量:421
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61964-3
摘要
Background The best way to manage restenosis in patients who have previously received a drug-eluting stent is unknown. We investigated the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and balloon angioplasty in these patients. Methods In this randomised, open-label trial, we enrolled patients older than 18 years with restenosis of at least 50% after implantation of any limus-eluting stent at three centres in Germany between Aug 3, 2009, and Oct 27, 2011. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1; stratified according to centre) to receive PEB, PES, or balloon angioplasty alone by means of sealed, opaque envelopes containing a computer-generated sequence. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation, but events and angiograms were assessed by individuals who were masked. The primary endpoint was diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography at 6–8 months. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987324. Findings We enrolled 402 patients, of whom 137 (34%) were assigned to PEB, 131 (33%) to PES, and 134 (33%) to balloon angioplasty. Follow-up angiography at 6-8 months was available for 338 (84%) patients. PEB was non-inferior to PES in terms of diameter stenosis (38·0% [SD 21·5] vs 37·4% [21·8]; difference 0·6%, one-sided 95% CI 4·9%; pnon-inferiority=0·007; non-inferiority margin of 7%). Findings were consistent in per-protocol analysis (pnon-inferiority=0·011). PEB and PES were superior to balloon angioplasty alone (54·1% [25·0]; psuperiority<0·0001 for both comparisons). Frequency of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion thrombosis did not differ between groups. Interpretation By obviating the need for additional stent implantation, PEB could be a useful treatment for patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Funding Deutsches Herzzentrum.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI