Semaglutide versus placebo in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials

医学 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 赛马鲁肽 心力衰竭 内科学 安慰剂 射血分数 心脏病学 临床试验 2型糖尿病 物理疗法 糖尿病 内分泌学 利拉鲁肽 替代医学 病理
作者
Javed Butler,Sanjiv J. Shah,Mark C. Petrie,Barry A. Borlaug,Steen Z. Abildstrøm,Melanie J. Davies,G. Kees Hovingh,Dalane W. Kitzman,Daniél Vega Møller,Subodh Verma,Mette Nygaard Einfeldt,Marie L.S. Lindegaard,Søren Rasmussen,Walter P. Abhayaratna,Fozia Ahmed,Tuvia Ben‐Gal,Vijay Chopra,Justin A. Ezekowitz,Michael Fu,Hiroshi Ito,Małgorzata Lelonek,Vojtěch Melenovský,Béla Merkely,Julio Núñez,Eduardo R. Perna,Morten Schou,Michele Senni,Kavita Sharma,Peter van der Meer,Dirk von Lewinski,Dennis Wolf,Mikhail Kosiborod
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00469-0
摘要

In the STEP-HFpEF (NCT04788511) and STEP-HFpEF DM (NCT04916470) trials, the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide improved symptoms, physical limitations, bodyweight, and exercise function in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. In this prespecified pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, we aimed to provide a more definitive assessment of the effects of semaglutide across a range of outcomes and to test whether these effects were consistent across key patient subgroups.We conducted a prespecified pooled analysis of individual patient data from STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials at 129 clinical research sites in 18 countries. In both trials, eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 45%, a BMI of at least 30 kg/m2, New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms, and a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS; a measure of heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations) of less than 90 points. In STEP-HFpEF, people with diabetes or glycated haemoglobin A1c concentrations of at least 6·5% were excluded, whereas for inclusion in STEP-HFpEF DM participants had to have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at least 90 days before screening and to have an HbA1c of 10% or lower. In both trials, participants were randomly assigned to either 2·4 mg semaglutide once weekly or matched placebo for 52 weeks. The dual primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS and bodyweight in all randomly assigned participants. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 52 in 6-min walk distance, a hierarchical composite endpoint (all-cause death, heart failure events, and differences in changes in KCCQ-CSS and 6-min walk distance); and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations. Heterogeneity in treatment effects was assessed across subgroups of interest. We assessed safety in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.Between March 19, 2021 and March 9, 2022, 529 people were randomly assigned in STEP-HFpEF, and between June 27, 2021 and Sept 2, 2022, 616 were randomly assigned in STEP-HFpEF DM. Overall, 1145 were included in our pooled analysis, 573 in the semaglutide group and 572 in the placebo group. Improvements in KCCQ-CSS and reductions in bodyweight between baseline and week 52 were significantly greater in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (mean between-group difference for the change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS 7·5 points [95% CI 5·3 to 9·8]; p<0·0001; mean between-group difference in bodyweight at week 52 -8·4% [-9·2 to -7·5]; p<0·0001). For the confirmatory secondary endpoints, 6-min walk distance (mean between-group difference at week 52 17·1 metres [9·2 to 25·0]) and the hierarchical composite endpoint (win ratio 1·65 [1·42 to 1·91]) were significantly improved, and CRP concentrations (treatment ratio 0·64 [0·56 to 0·72]) were significantly reduced, in the semaglutide group compared with the placebo group (p<0·0001 for all comparisons). For the dual primary endpoints, the efficacy of semaglutide was largely consistent across multiple subgroups, including those defined by age, race, sex, BMI, systolic blood pressure, baseline CRP, and left ventricular ejection fraction. 161 serious adverse events were reported in the semaglutide group compared with 301 in the placebo group.In this prespecified pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, semaglutide was superior to placebo in improving heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations, and reducing bodyweight in participants with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. These effects were largely consistent across patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Semaglutide was well tolerated.Novo Nordisk.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
汉堡包应助爱丽酱采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
甜橘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
穿林打夜完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
可可发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
机灵非笑发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
7秒前
11秒前
紫金大萝卜应助追风采纳,获得10
12秒前
健忘天与完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科目三应助小玲仔采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
19秒前
情怀应助pan采纳,获得10
19秒前
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
kellymmbaby完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
怕孤单的听寒完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
我是老大应助优美的冰海采纳,获得10
25秒前
miya发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
super chan完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
ahahahahaha完成签到 ,获得积分20
28秒前
彭于晏应助铁大梁浩然采纳,获得10
28秒前
Vincent发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
31秒前
btsforever完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
含蓄的三颜完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
意难平云南分平完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
36秒前
Werido完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
背后雨安完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
miya完成签到,获得积分20
39秒前
yzy完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
41秒前
41秒前
SciGPT应助MichaelQin采纳,获得10
42秒前
43秒前
高分求助中
The three stars each : the Astrolabes and related texts 1070
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Sport in der Antike 800
Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure 666
De arte gymnastica. The art of gymnastics 600
少脉山油柑叶的化学成分研究 530
Berns Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2410413
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2105920
关于积分的说明 5320280
捐赠科研通 1833352
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 913570
版权声明 560825
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 488515