医学
目标温度管理
背景(考古学)
心肺复苏术
咨询委员会
重症监护医学
体温过低
临床试验
专家意见
复苏
随机对照试验
神经学
自然循环恢复
急诊医学
精神科
内科学
古生物学
生物
政治学
公共行政
作者
Sarah M. Perman,Jason A. Bartos,Marina Del Rios,Michael W. Donnino,Karen G. Hirsch,Jacob C. Jentzer,Peter J. Kudenchuk,Michael C. Kurz,Carolina B. Maciel,Venu Menon,Ashish R. Panchal,Jon C. Rittenberger,Katherine M. Berg
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2023-08-16
卷期号:148 (12): 982-988
被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1161/cir.0000000000001164
摘要
Targeted temperature management has been a cornerstone of post-cardiac arrest care for patients remaining unresponsive after return of spontaneous circulation since the initial trials in 2002 found that mild therapeutic hypothermia improves neurological outcome. The suggested temperature range expanded in 2015 in response to a large trial finding that outcomes were not better with treatment at 33° C compared with 36° C. In 2021, another large trial was published in which outcomes with temperature control at 33° C were not better than those of patients treated with a strategy of strict normothermia. On the basis of these new data, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and other organizations have altered their treatment recommendations for temperature management after cardiac arrest. The new American Heart Association guidelines on this topic will be introduced in a 2023 focused update. To provide guidance to clinicians while this focused update is forthcoming, the American Heart Association's Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee convened a writing group to review the TTM2 trial (Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) in the context of other recent evidence and to present an opinion on how this trial may influence clinical practice. This science advisory was informed by review of the TTM2 trial, consideration of other recent influential studies, and discussion between cardiac arrest experts in the fields of cardiology, critical care, emergency medicine, and neurology. Conclusions presented in this advisory statement do not replace current guidelines but are intended to provide an expert opinion on novel literature that will be incorporated into future guidelines and suggest the opportunity for reassessment of current clinical practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI