Pro: Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. Is frozen embryo transfer the future?

低温保存 胚胎移植 活产 怀孕 随机对照试验 玻璃化 胚胎冷冻保存 胚胎 更安全的 妊娠率 单胚胎移植 产科 医学 妇科 男科 生物 外科 计算机科学 遗传学 计算机安全 细胞生物学
作者
Christos Venetis
出处
期刊:Human Reproduction [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:37 (7): 1379-1387 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deac126
摘要

Embryo cryopreservation has been an integral part of ART for close to 40 years and vitrification has boosted overall ART efficacy and safety. Recently, there has been a vivid scientific discussion on whether elective cryopreservation of all embryos (freeze-all) should be pursued for most patients, with a fresh embryo transfer taking place only in selected cases. In terms of efficacy, the available evidence suggests that the freeze-all strategy leads to higher live birth rates after the first embryo transfer compared to the conventional strategy in high responders, while there is no difference in normal responders. There is no evidence to suggest that the freeze-all strategy is inferior to the conventional strategy of fresh transfer when comparing cumulative live birth rates using data from all available randomized controlled trials. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is significantly reduced in the freeze-all policy. However, regarding obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes, the evidence suggests that each strategy is associated with certain risks and, therefore, there is no approach that could be unequivocally accepted as safer. Similarly, limited evidence does not support the notion that patients would be universally against freeze-all owing to the inevitable delay in pregnancy achievement. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of freeze-all is likely to vary in different settings and there have been studies supporting that this policy can be, under certain conditions, cost-effective. Adoption of the freeze-all policy can also allow for more flexible treatment strategies that have the potential to increase efficacy, reduce cost and make treatment easier for patients and clinics. Importantly, freeze-all does not require the use of any experimental technologies, further training of personnel or the costly acquisition of new equipment. For these reasons, transitioning to the freeze-all policy for most patients appears to be the next logical step in ART.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
王亚楠完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
wjw完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
xms2022发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Song完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
无奈的书琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
molihuakai应助甜甜的粥采纳,获得10
14秒前
cdercder应助zhangsan采纳,获得10
16秒前
采采完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
直率若烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
22秒前
忒寒碜完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
xms2022完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
果酱完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
Samsara完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
燕子发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
海派Hi完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
赫连烙完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
sdjjis完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
燕子完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
Sweety_完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
ALU完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
行走的猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
Criminology34应助muffler采纳,获得10
44秒前
卫化蛹完成签到,获得积分20
44秒前
jason完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
山是山三十三完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
刚子完成签到 ,获得积分0
52秒前
酥酥完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
上官枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
小洪俊熙完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
科研通AI6.3应助润泽采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Yivano完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Wendy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
弃医从个啥完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
收集快乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
南攻完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
adsf发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
思念变成王年年完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7257699
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8879580
关于积分的说明 18757499
捐赠科研通 6938073
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201148
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375264
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176963