样本量测定
统计能力
样品(材料)
先验与后验
心理学
功率(物理)
心理学研究
功率分析
集合(抽象数据类型)
统计
研究设计
价值(数学)
应用心理学
计算机科学
社会心理学
数学
认识论
哲学
化学
物理
程序设计语言
量子力学
色谱法
作者
Elizabeth Collins,Roger Watt
出处
期刊:Collabra
[University of California Press]
日期:2021-01-01
卷期号:7 (1)
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1525/collabra.28250
摘要
Statistical power is key to planning studies if understood and used correctly. Power is the probability of obtaining a statistically significant p-value, given a set alpha, sample size, and population effect size. The literature suggests that psychology studies are underpowered due to small sample sizes, and that researchers do not hold accurate intuitions about sensible sample sizes and associated levels of power. In this study, we surveyed 214 psychological researchers, and asked them about their experiences of using a priori power analysis, effect size estimation methods, post hoc power, and their understanding of what the term “power” actually means. Power analysis use was high, although participants reported difficulties with complex research designs, and effect size estimation. Participants also typically could not accurately define power. If psychological researchers are expected to compute a priori power analyses to plan their research, clearer educational material and guidelines should be made available.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI