亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comment on “ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About Colonoscopy”

结肠镜检查 保证 考试(生物学) 医学 质量(理念) 病人护理 梅德林 医疗保健 医学教育 心理学 内科学 护理部 结直肠癌 古生物学 经济 法学 哲学 癌症 认识论 金融经济学 生物 经济增长 政治学
作者
Qiqi Wu
出处
期刊:Gastroenterology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:166 (1): 219-220 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.030
摘要

I read with great interest the recent article in Gastroenterology by Lee et al1Lee T.-C. et al.Gastroenterology. 2023; 165: 509-511.e7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar that aimed to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT to provide satisfactory answers to common patient questions about colonoscopy. As artificial intelligence systems like ChatGPT become more prevalent in health care, it is crucial that we critically evaluate their capabilities and limitations. The authors' findings that ChatGPT can provide responses comparable with traditional medical resources in understandability, adequacy, and satisfaction ratings are important initial validations. However, several limitations and perspectives deserve further discussion before integrating ChatGPT into clinical use. First, the study evaluated only 8 common questions retrieved from 3 hospital websites. Expanding the sample size and diversity of questions could provide more robust results. Because patient questions often focus on procedural expectations, quality of life impact, and cost concerns, evaluating ChatGPT's performance on these topics will offer additional clinically useful insights. Second, the responses generated by ChatGPT bypass the clinical reasoning involved in providing personalized recommendations, which considers patients' medical history and test results. Third, the lack of patient raters is an important limitation, as acknowledged by the authors. Including patient perspectives would more authentically assess the utility of artificial intelligence–generated medical information from the end-user standpoint. Qualitative feedback could reveal nuances not captured by quantitative ratings. Furthermore, ethical implications of reliance on ChatGPT for clinical use also warrant consideration.2Rahimzadeh V. et al.Am J Bioeth. 2023; 23: 1-11Google Scholar Despite the limitations, the insights gained from this study open up avenues for impactful work in the near future, which deserve more attention. Looking ahead, an exciting area for further exploration is training domain-specific models like 'MedGPT.' Retraining ChatGPT on a clinical corpus could potentially enhance the accuracy, readability, and bedside manner of responses. Collaborations with patients to co-design prompts and grading rubrics would uphold patient-centered principles. Moreover, evaluating the integration of ChatGPT into electronic health records could facilitate seamless clinical application. With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, there is substantial promise in leveraging these tools to enhance patient education and foster collaborative decision-making, if implemented under strict clinical oversight and guidance. In this regard, the work by Lee et al1Lee T.-C. et al.Gastroenterology. 2023; 165: 509-511.e7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar has opened an insightful avenue for future research. In summary, although Lee et al provide early data on an innovative concept, expanding the scope and methodology could offer more comprehensive insights to realize the full potential of ChatGPT in patient education and other promising clinical areas. ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About ColonoscopyGastroenterologyVol. 165Issue 2PreviewChatGPT (OpenAI) is a 175 billion–parameter large language model (LLM) artificial intelligence (AI) that was released in November 2022. ChatGPT is developed based on the generative pretrained transformer (GPT) 3.5 natural language processing technology and provides a conversational text response to a given prompt.1 Full-Text PDF Open AccessReplyGastroenterologyVol. 166Issue 1PreviewWe appreciate the comments by Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit,1 Wu,2 and Tariq et al3 about our article.4 We agree with these valuable comments, which point out the importance of physician oversight, patient involvement, integration of evidence-based medicine, and patient-specific information to the optimal design and use of conversational artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for shared decision making and for communication between patients and health care providers. Full-Text PDF

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
无极微光应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
刚刚
刚刚
深情安青应助梧桐鱼采纳,获得10
10秒前
29秒前
bigegg完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
mengzhe完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
Nexus应助gujianhua采纳,获得10
45秒前
123456完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
NexusExplorer应助我问问采纳,获得10
1分钟前
一粟完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
彭于晏应助健康的忆寒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
梧桐鱼发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
关你屁事完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
大壮发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
我问问发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
yumo完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
梧桐鱼完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
FashionBoy应助李滋滋采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
凉凉有点热完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助大气凝云采纳,获得50
1分钟前
斯文败类应助caspar采纳,获得30
1分钟前
杰杰完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
我问问完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
orixero应助晴子采纳,获得10
1分钟前
深情安青应助wywy采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
ChenLan发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
晴子发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
ChenLan完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
纯情的凡双完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Cold War Transcended: Australia's China Policy, 1949-1990 998
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
Testimonial Injustice and Trust 510
Fundamentals of Body MRI 3rd Edition 400
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6632888
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8392841
关于积分的说明 17951324
捐赠科研通 5814381
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2965369
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1940546
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1852390