Fentanyl may not be necessary for adequate endoscopic moderate sedation

作者
Greg S Cohen,Kwang‐Youn A. Kim
出处
期刊:World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Baishideng Publishing Group]
卷期号:17 (5): 105031-105031 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.4253/wjge.v17.i5.105031
摘要

BACKGROUND Although the majority of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies in the United States are now performed with propofol sedation, a substantial minority are performed with midazolam and fentanyl sedation. Despite the ubiquity of conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl in the United States, there is scant evidence specifically supporting the superiority of midazolam plus fentanyl over single agent midazolam sedation in GI endoscopy. We hypothesize that single agent sedation with midazolam is noninferior to sedation with midazolam plus fentanyl in GI endoscopy. AIM To investigate whether sedation with midazolam alone is noninferior to sedation with midazolam plus fentanyl in GI endoscopy. METHODS We conducted a randomized, single-blind study to compare the safety and effectiveness of single agent midazolam vs. standard fentanyl/midazolam moderate sedation in 300 outpatients presenting for upper endoscopy and/or colonoscopy at a tertiary care hospital. Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction as measured by the previously validated Procedural Sedation Assessment Survey. Secondary outcomes were procedure quality measures and adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed by a biomedical statistician using the χ 2 test, Fisher’s exact test, and Welch’s 2-sample t -test. RESULTS There was no difference in patient satisfaction between sedation groups, as measured by a less than 1 point difference between groups in Procedural Sedation Assessment Survey scores for discomfort during the procedure, and for preference for level of sedation with future procedures. There were no differences in adverse events or procedure quality measures. Cecal intubation time was 1 minute longer in the single agent midazolam group, and an average of 2.7 mg more midazolam was administered when fentanyl was not included in the sedation regimen. The recruitment goal of 772 patients was not reached. CONCLUSION It may be possible to minimize or avoid using fentanyl in endoscopist administered moderate sedation for GI endoscopy. We hope these findings spur further work in this under-researched area.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被js采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
陈陈陈完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Jing完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
ccc发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
KK发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
明杰发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Lyun发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小二郎的应助被粗暴的君浩采纳,获得50
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
华凯完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
李健的小迷弟的应助被111采纳,获得10
6秒前
李健的粉丝团团长的应助被AAA采纳,获得10
6秒前
bluebell完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
栗子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
leung发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
跑快点发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
ling发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
充电宝的应助被yiyi采纳,获得30
9秒前
xxy991007发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
领导范儿的应助被鸡鸭鹅采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
酷酷的飞发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
领导范儿的应助被ccc采纳,获得10
11秒前
CodeCraft的应助被小兔采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
小星完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
小A同学发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
ldk完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Challenging Attachment Theory 600
Analyses de reconnaissances de dettes passées devant les échevins d'Ypres (1249-1291) 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8140269
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9540579
关于积分的说明 21641114
捐赠科研通 7724345
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3421054
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2546262
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2463114