汇报
荟萃分析
系统回顾
科克伦图书馆
梅德林
医学
心理学
护理部
医学教育
内科学
政治学
法学
作者
Yushuo Niu,Ting Liu,Kuinan Li,Mengke Sun,Yaru Sun,Xin Wang,Xiuling Yang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105113
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate debriefing methods' effectiveness on learning outcomes for nursing students. A systematic review and meta-analysis were applied according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Publications were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANFANG (China) databases from inception to 2020. Two researchers independently retrieved articles and evaluated their quality. Review Manager version 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis, following the PRISMA guidelines. Bias risk was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute manual. Heterogeneity was assessed by I 2 statistics. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for effect size analysis based on learning outcomes. Sixteen studies were selected in the systematic review and 13 studies with 1637 nursing students were included in the meta-analysis. Five debriefing methods were used in the intervention group. The analysis showed that Debriefing for Meaningful Learning was more effective on the debriefing quality (SMD = 0.52, 95%CI [0.32, 0.72]), and that video-assisted debriefing was more effective on nursing students' experiences (SMD = 0.30, 95%CI [0.02, 0.58]) and critical thinking (SMD = 0.90, 95%CI [0.65, 1.15]) compared with the usual debriefing. However, written debriefing did not show better effects on students' experiences (SMD = −0.22, 95%CI [−0.51, 0.07]), and peer-led debriefing did not show better effects on the debriefing quality compared with the usual debriefing (SMD = −0.15, 95%CI [−1.43, −0.67]). The study indicated that Debriefing for Meaningful Learning and video-assisted debriefing showed a positive impact on nursing education. Future studies that have larger sample sizes, high-quality debriefing methods, robust study designs, and other learning outcomes are required. • There are many kinds of debriefing methods in nursing education. • Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) and video-assisted debriefing had a positive effect compared with usual debriefing. • The effectiveness of written and peer-led debriefing was not significant compared with usual debriefing.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI