Outcomes of posterior labral repair with or without concomitant high-grade glenohumeral chondral pathology: a retrospective cohort with minimum 2-year follow-up

Background The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent posterior labral repair with and without concomitant glenohumeral chondral pathology. Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary posterior labral repair over 5 years. Charts were reviewed to determine the presence and location of high-grade (Outerbridge grade III or IV) pathology. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Western Ontario Stability Index (WOSI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores were collected at median 71.5-month follow-up and compared between patients with and without concomitant chondral pathology during the index procedure. Results Of 100 patients who underwent primary posterior labral repair, 43% had glenoid and/or humeral-sided high-grade chondral pathology. Patients with chondral pathology were older than those without (P < .001). A higher proportion of patients with chondral pathology underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis (19.3% vs. 37.2%, P = .046). The type of anchor (all-suture or solid body, P = .010) used was different between patients with and without chondral pathology at time of posterior labrum repair. There was no difference in reoperation rates at final follow-up between patients with and without chondral damage at time of index procedure (P = .200). All outcome scores were similar between all comer patients with and without chondral pathology. Isolated glenoid pathology was significantly associated with lower QuickDASH (P = .018), higher SST (P = .013), lower VAS (P = .016), and lower WOSI scores (P = .046) compared to patients with bipolar lesions. After stratifying by age, there was an association between chondral pathology and lower VAS and WOSI scores in patients aged <35 years, and there was an association between chondral pathology and lower SST scores in patients aged ≥35 years. Conclusion Based on median QuickDASH, SST, WOSI, and VAS scores, subjective and functional outcomes after primary arthroscopic posterior labral repair were not negatively influenced by the presence of concomitant chondral damage at the time of surgery for patients aged <35 years at minimum 2-year follow-up. Although our primary outcome score, the QuickDASH, was not significantly associated with the presence of chondral damage in patients aged >35 years, SST scores were negatively influenced by concomitant chondral damage in this older cohort, but this may not be adequately powered. It appeared that patients with chondral damage localized to the glenoid tended to have better outcomes scores that those with bipolar damage. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent posterior labral repair with and without concomitant glenohumeral chondral pathology. A retrospective review was performed on patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary posterior labral repair over 5 years. Charts were reviewed to determine the presence and location of high-grade (Outerbridge grade III or IV) pathology. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Western Ontario Stability Index (WOSI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores were collected at median 71.5-month follow-up and compared between patients with and without concomitant chondral pathology during the index procedure. Of 100 patients who underwent primary posterior labral repair, 43% had glenoid and/or humeral-sided high-grade chondral pathology. Patients with chondral pathology were older than those without (P < .001). A higher proportion of patients with chondral pathology underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis (19.3% vs. 37.2%, P = .046). The type of anchor (all-suture or solid body, P = .010) used was different between patients with and without chondral pathology at time of posterior labrum repair. There was no difference in reoperation rates at final follow-up between patients with and without chondral damage at time of index procedure (P = .200). All outcome scores were similar between all comer patients with and without chondral pathology. Isolated glenoid pathology was significantly associated with lower QuickDASH (P = .018), higher SST (P = .013), lower VAS (P = .016), and lower WOSI scores (P = .046) compared to patients with bipolar lesions. After stratifying by age, there was an association between chondral pathology and lower VAS and WOSI scores in patients aged <35 years, and there was an association between chondral pathology and lower SST scores in patients aged ≥35 years. Based on median QuickDASH, SST, WOSI, and VAS scores, subjective and functional outcomes after primary arthroscopic posterior labral repair were not negatively influenced by the presence of concomitant chondral damage at the time of surgery for patients aged <35 years at minimum 2-year follow-up. Although our primary outcome score, the QuickDASH, was not significantly associated with the presence of chondral damage in patients aged >35 years, SST scores were negatively influenced by concomitant chondral damage in this older cohort, but this may not be adequately powered. It appeared that patients with chondral damage localized to the glenoid tended to have better outcomes scores that those with bipolar damage.