自动化
计算机科学
分歧(语言学)
知识管理
动力学(音乐)
计算信任
空格(标点符号)
系统动力学
控制(管理)
管理科学
风险分析(工程)
自治
期限(时间)
作者
Vianney Renata,John D. Lee
出处
期刊:Human Factors
[SAGE Publishing]
日期:2026-08-13
卷期号:: 187208261472131-187208261472131
标识
DOI:10.1177/00187208261472131
摘要
ObjectiveWe develop a dynamic model to understand how trust in automation evolves within teams through team member interactions, assessing whether trust converges or diverges over time.BackgroundExisting research assumes that individual and team trust in automation converges over time, but these studies typically last only hours or days. This assumption may not hold for long-duration missions, like deep space exploration, where team dynamics and trust might evolve in a contingent rather than convergent manner. Contingent behavior evolves towards different endpoints based on small perturbations, whereas convergent behavior evolves to similar endpoints.MethodsWe developed a stochastic, discrete-event agent-based trust dynamics model that goes beyond existing models that only consider past interactions with automation. Our model incorporates team conversations, individual automation experience, and turn-taking interactions.ResultsConsistent with human subjects data, the model showed divergent trust behavior where team members' trust levels did not converge to similar values over time.ConclusionsDynamical models of trust in teams can show contingent behavior. Trust in automation within and across teams can diverge, indicating a new mechanism for trust dynamics. Trust calibration strategies should address potential divergence.ApplicationsDesigners should consider the divergence of trust within and between teams, especially for long-duration missions. Methods to calibrate trust in this situation may include structured debriefs or shared automation feedback displays.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI