The prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy according to different diagnostic criteria

Abstract Background and Aims Recently published criteria by 2019 Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium set a lower threshold for reduced ejection fraction to diagnose systolic dysfunction in cirrhotic patients, and stress testing was replaced by echocardiography strain imaging. The criteria to diagnose diastolic dysfunction are in general concordant with the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines and differ considerably from the 2005 Montreal recommendations. We aimed to assess the prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy according to different diagnostic criteria. Methods Cirrhotic patients without another structural heart disease, arterial hypertension, portal vein thrombosis, HCC outside Milan criteria and presence of TIPS were enrolled. Speckle‐tracking echocardiography was performed by EACVI certified investigators. Results A total of 122 patients with cirrhosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy was similar for 2005 Montreal and 2019 CCC: 67.2% vs 55.7% ( P = .09); and significantly higher compared to 2009 ASE/EACVI criteria: 67.2% vs 35.2% ( P < .0001) and 55.7% vs 35.2% ( P = .002) respectively. Significantly more patients had diastolic dysfunction according to the 2005 Montreal compared to the 2009 ASE/EACVI and 2019 CCC criteria: 64.8% vs 32.8% ( P < .0001) and 64.8% vs 7.4% ( P < .0001). Systolic dysfunction was more frequently diagnosed according to 2019 CCC criteria compared to 2005 Montreal (53.3% vs 16.4%, P < .0001) or ASE/EACVI criteria (53.3% vs 4.9%, P < .0001). Conclusion Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy was present in around 60% of cirrhotic patients when applying the hepatological criteria. A considerably higher prevalence of systolic dysfunction according to the 2019 CCC criteria was observed. Long‐term follow‐up studies are needed to establish the validity of these criteria to predict clinically relevant outcomes.