医学
硫唑嘌呤
英夫利昔单抗
阿达木单抗
免疫原性
溃疡性结肠炎
硫嘌呤甲基转移酶
炎症性肠病
克罗恩病
内科学
甲氨蝶呤
药品
药代动力学
胃肠病学
维多利祖马布
免疫学
疾病
药理学
抗体
作者
Konstantinos Papamichael,Adam S. Cheifetz,Peter Miles Irving
出处
期刊:Gut
[BMJ]
日期:2020-02-19
卷期号:69 (7): 1165-1167
被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320677
摘要
Antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has revolutionised the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, up to 30% of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) do not respond to anti-TNF therapy, often referred to as primary non-responders. Additionally, almost 50% of patients who initially respond to anti-TNF lose response over time, a phenomenon known as secondary loss of response (SLR).1 Both of these negative outcomes are most commonly caused by pharmacokinetic issues characterised by undetectable or low drug concentrations due to increased clearance with or without the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA), so-called immunogenicity.2 The recent prospective The Personalised Anti-TNF therapy in Crohn’s Disease Study (PANTS) study showed that for both infliximab and adalimumab, suboptimal week 14 drug concentrations predicted immunogenicity, and the development of ADA predicted subsequent low drug concentrations.3 Immunogenicity may account for at least 20% of SLR in patients with IBD.2
The addition of an immunomodulator (IMM), such as a thiopurine or methotrexate, has been shown to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of anti-TNF agents both by attenuating immunogenicity and increasing drug concentrations.3–5 These factors consequently lead to better long-term clinical outcomes and less SLR.3–5 A post hoc analysis of the Study of Biologic and Immunomodulator naive Patients in Crohn’s Disease (SONIC) randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed that combination therapy with azathioprine appears to …
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI