Monitoring relative blood volume changes during hemodialysis: Impact of the priming procedure

The monitoring of relative blood volume (RBV) changes during hemodialysis is increasingly used to evaluate the effect of dialyzer ultrafiltration on intravascular volume to guide the removal of excess fluid in a manner that maintains hemodynamic stability of the patient. RBV monitoring is typically based on an optical or acoustic sensor placed in the arterial blood line that measures a marker of hemoconcentration, such as hematocrit, hemoglobin, or total blood protein. However, the accuracy of RBV monitors and the impact of their clinical use remain the subject of ongoing debate. Here, we show that, depending on the procedure of filling the extracorporeal circuit with the patient's blood at the beginning of the dialysis session, the indications of an RBV monitor may be misleading as to the actual changes of the intravascular volume. When the blood is first pumped into the dialyzer, the priming fluid (saline) that fills the circuit may be either infused into the patient or disposed of to a drain bag. In the latter case, the intravascular volume is suddenly reduced, which is not accounted for by RBV monitors that track only the subsequent reductions in blood volume due to dialyzer ultrafiltration. We analyzed this general aspect of RBV monitoring using model-based simulations and showed quantitatively how RBV changes calculated using hematocrit differ depending on the priming procedure.