可靠性
随机对照试验
相关性(法律)
医疗保健
计算机科学
系统回顾
控制(管理)
心理学
医学
梅德林
人工智能
认识论
病理
经济增长
哲学
经济
法学
政治学
作者
Abdullah Al Noman,Onusree Sarkar,Tanzia Mohsin Mita,Khadiza Siddika,Fahmida Afrose
出处
期刊:
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2023-11-10
卷期号:2 (2): 270-273
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ipha.2023.11.002
摘要
The level of evidence is a fundamental structure for assessing the excellence of evidence while making healthcare choices. It assesses medical research according to its structure, credibility, and relevance. The different degrees of proof are frequently represented as a triangle shape, with the most powerful proof on the highest point. The pyramid is divided into two primary parts: refined data (systematic reviews, meta-analyses) that combines information from multiple studies, and raw data (randomized trials, cohort studies, case series) that consists of original research. Systematic evaluations condense results from various investigations on a subject using thorough, replicable approaches. Meta-analyses mathematically integrate information from similar research studies. Case studies provide information about a specific patient. Case-control studies examine the occurrences in separate groups of people who have a particular illness and those who do not. Randomly assigned intervention and control groups are compared in randomized controlled experiments to observe the differences in their outcomes. Cohort studies track groups over a period to investigate connections between factors and results. The upper levels of the pyramid are typically seen as more trustworthy proof because of thorough combination or research structure. However, every level provides valuable information. Recognizing the positive aspects of various research methods enables individuals to assess the credibility of information when making choices related to healthcare.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI