医学
外科
充气的
入射(几何)
前瞻性队列研究
队列研究
葡萄糖酸洗必泰
假肢
队列
洗必泰
勃起功能障碍
并发症
阴茎假体
回顾性队列研究
牙科
伤口感染
阴茎
假体设计
袖口
作者
Samuel Ivan,Elia Abou Chawareb,Muhammed Hammad,Michael Lesgart,Bryce Baird,P Bajic,David W. Barham,Helen L. Bernie,Raevti Bole,Paul Chung,Ketch Cowan,Zayda Dominick,J Good,Sevann Helo,Michael H. Hsieh,Brian H. Im,Yash Kadakia,Tobias Köhler,Aaron Lentz,Marcelo Mass-Lindenbaum
标识
DOI:10.1097/ju.0000000000004853
摘要
PURPOSE: Available data are conflicting and limited regarding the antimicrobial effectiveness of 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (0.05% CHG) with hydrophilic inflatable penile prostheses (IPP). We used a large multi-institutional cohort to explore the relationship between intraoperative 0.05% CHG use and hydrophilic IPP infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients who underwent hydrophilic IPP implantation. Consecutive cases involving intraoperative 0.05% CHG as an irrigant and/or dip were compared with a similar number of consecutive control cases without 0.05% CHG. The primary outcome was IPP explant for infection. Predictors of infection were assessed with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Exploratory subgroup analyses further characterized specific 0.05% CHG scenarios. RESULTS: = .002). On subgroup analysis, the incidence of infection with use of 0.05% CHG as irrigant and dip was 4.5% compared with 3.8% when 0.05% CHG irrigation was used with antimicrobial dip. The rate of infection with 0.05% CHG use was 3.5% for primary surgeries and 12% for revision surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 0.05% CHG with hydrophilic IPP was associated with an elevated infection rate. For hydrophilic IPP surgery, caution with 0.05% CHG use is warranted pending additional prospective evaluation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI