汇报
心理信息
定性研究
焦点小组
梅德林
内容分析
心理学
定性分析
医学教育
人口
系统回顾
数据收集
应用心理学
医学
社会科学
社会学
政治学
法学
人类学
环境卫生
作者
Laetitia Ricci,Jean‐Baptiste Lanfranchi,Fabienne Lemétayer,Christine Rotonda,Françis Guillemin,Joël Coste,Élisabeth Spitz
标识
DOI:10.1177/1049732318783186
摘要
A systematic review of articles using qualitative methods to generate questionnaire items identified in MEDLINE and PsycINFO from 2000 to 2014 was carried out. Articles were analyzed for (a) year of publication and journal domain, (b) qualitative data collection methods, (c) method of data content analysis, (d) professional experts' input in item generation, and (e) debriefing of the newly developed items. In total, 371 articles were included and results showed (a) an acceleration of published articles, (b) individual interviews and focus groups were common ways of generating items and no emergent approach was identified, (c) the content analysis was usually not described (43% of articles), (d) experts were involved in eliciting concepts in less than a third of articles, (e) 61% of articles involved a step of further submission of newly developed items to the population of interest. This review showed an insufficient reporting of qualitative methods used to generate new questionnaires despite previous recommendations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI