Polyplex System Versus Nucleofection for Human Skin Cell Transfection and Effect of Internal Ribosome Entry Site Sequence

Nonviral transfection has important implications on gene therapy because of its safety. In particular, polyfection and nucleofection are two widely used systems for nonviral gene delivery. Their potential depends on the transfection efficiency achieved, which is influenced in turn by the type of cells transfected and by the plasmid that carries the gene of interest. The efficiency of transfection by polyfection or nucleofection in human fibroblasts and keratinocytes was evaluated in this study. Transfections were performed with plasmids containing a gene of interest (human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide) and two reporter genes (red or green fluorescent protein) that included or not an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). The efficiency was measured by flow cytometry in terms of percentage of cells expressing the reporter gene; viability of transfected cells was also evaluated. It was found that nucleofection was more efficient than polyplexes for transfecting fibroblasts, while no significant differences were found between both systems of transfection when applied to keratinocytes. Regarding the viability of fibroblasts after transfection, values were high in both systems. In contrast, keratinocytes were more sensitive to nucleofection. It was also noted that both types of cells decreased reporter gene expression when IRES sequence was located upstream of the reporter gene, suggesting a negative effect on the expression of this gene. These results confirm that the transfection efficiency depends on the type of cells and the system used.