Seismic fault identification in coal mines based on the self-organizing map-gray wolf optimizer-support vector machine algorithm

Accurate fault identification in coal mines is important to improve mine safety and economic benefits. We compare various intelligent algorithms for data preprocessing and optimization and analyze the construction methods of seismic attribute data sets and the performance of intelligent optimization algorithms using fault identification accuracy as the discrimination index to find a better combined model for seismic fault identification. First, the training data set is constructed by mining the fault and nonfault information revealed by the roadway. The distribution characteristics of the seismic attribute data indicate similarities among them, and they are nonlinearly separable. Directly using the attributes to construct the data set, the accuracy of fault identification using the support vector machine (SVM) model is 78.41%. Principal component analysis (PCA) and self-organizing mapping (SOM) neural networks are used to extract effective information and then combined with the SVM classification model, and the accuracy of fault identification is 83.82% and 87.47%, respectively. Compared with the original data and PCA dimensionality reduction data, the accuracy of fault detection is improved by 9.06% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that SOM can effectively improve the accuracy of fault detection by eliminating similar attributes and reducing the weight of redundant information. Then, through a fixed attribute data set, genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and gray wolf optimizer (GWO) intelligent optimization algorithms are used to find the optimal kernel function parameter and penalty parameter of the SVM classifier. The accuracy rate of the SOM-GWO-SVM model reaches 91.12%, compared with the SOM-PSO-SVM and SOM-GA-SVM, and the model accuracy is increased by 5.2% and 5.61%, respectively. Compared with PSO and GA, the GWO algorithm has a better global search ability. The identification result of the SOM-GWO-SVM model is closest to the actual fault exposure, especially for the identification of “short” faults and associated faults, which has obvious advantages over the traditional manual interpretation in terms of efficiency and accuracy.