普瑞巴林
医学
安慰剂
耐受性
随机对照试验
麻醉
度洛西汀
神经病理性疼痛
不利影响
周围神经病变
内科学
糖尿病
内分泌学
病理
替代医学
作者
Shilpi Dhawan,Amol Bongirwar,Marta Muñoz‐Tudurí,Aman Khanna Romesh,Prakash Kurmi,Rahul Jankar
摘要
ABSTRACT Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of a once‐daily prolonged release (PR) pregabalin formulation to pregabalin immediate release (IR) in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Patients and Methods This was a non‐inferiority, randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, multiple‐dose, multicenter, active and placebo controlled, three‐arm, parallel study. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive pregabalin PR tablet, pregabalin IR hard capsule (Lyrica) or placebo at an optimized dose based on individual subject's response and tolerability for 13 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the mean weekly pain score from baseline to end of treatment. Results Overall, 453 patients were randomized. In the per protocol (PP) analysis set, the least square mean (LSM) difference between test and reference treatment for the change in weekly pain score from baseline to end of treatment was 0.06 (95% CI: −0.28, 0.41, p = 0.7121), indicating that pregabalin PR was non‐inferior to pregabalin IR. In the Full Analysis Set (FAS), the LSM of change in mean weekly pain score from baseline to end of treatment for test, reference, and placebo groups were −3.43, −3.49, and −3.04, respectively. Test and reference products were superior to placebo ( p = 0.0158 and 0.0047, respectively). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of pregabalin PR was comparable to pregabalin IR for the treatment of pain in patients with DPN.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI