Reply to the letter to editor regarding “Peri-operative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery – a double blinded, randomized controlled study”

We thank the readers (Yang et al) for their interest in our article titled, Peri-operative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery - a double blinded, randomized controlled study [ [1] Kanna RM Ramachandran K Subramanian JB Shetty AP Rajasekaran S Peri-operative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery-a double blinded, randomized controlled study. Spine J. 2022; (S1529-9430(22)00156-5)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.010 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (0) Google Scholar ]. They have raised a few concerns and we are glad to clarify their doubts. Letter to the editor regarding, “Peri-operative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery-a double blinded, randomized controlled study” by Kanna et al.The Spine JournalVol. 22Issue 11PreviewWe read with great interest the recently published article by Kanna et al [1] entitled, “Peri-operative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery-a double blinded, randomized controlled study,” published in April 2022 in The Spine Journal. We appreciate the authors’ great work, however, after reading the article carefully, we also found some worthwhile issues that we would like to raise to the investigators. Full-Text PDF