已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam versus propofol during EUS: a multicenter randomized controlled study

医学 异丙酚 麻醉 镇静 镇静剂 心肺适能 不利影响 临床终点 随机对照试验 外科 内科学
作者
Jung Wan Choe,Moon Jae Chung,Se Woo Park,Dongwook Oh,Sung Yong Han,Min Jae Yang,Eui Joo Kim,Jae Hee Cho,Kyong Joo Lee,Sung Ill Jang
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:100 (2): 183-191.e1 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.001
摘要

Background and aims Propofol, a widely used sedative in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, is associated with cardiorespiratory suppression. Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative with rapid onset and minimal cardiorespiratory depression. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures. Methods A multicenter randomized controlled study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 in patients who underwent EUS procedures. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or propofol as a sedative agent. The primary endpoint was cardiorespiratory adverse events during the procedure, including desaturation, respiratory depression, hypotension, and tachycardia. Secondary endpoints included the time to achieve sedation, recovery time, quality of sedation, pain at the injection site, and satisfaction of both the endoscopists and patients. Results Four hundred patients enrolled in the study: 200 received remimazolam (10.8±7.7 mg) and 200 received propofol (88.0±49.1 mg). For cardiorespiratory adverse events, the remimazolam group experienced fewer occurrences than the propofol group (8.5% vs. 16%, p=0.022). There was a non-significant trend toward less oxygen desaturation (1.0% vs 3.5%, p= 0.09), respiratory depression (0.5% vs 1.5%, p= 0.62), hypotension (2.5% vs 5.5%, p=0.12) and tachycardia (4.5% vs 5.5%, p=0.68) with remimazolam than with propofol. Remimazolam showed a shorter induction time than propofol, while maintaining comparable awakening and recovery times. Injection site pain was significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group. The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly higher quality of sedation and satisfaction scores than the propofol group, as evaluated by both endoscopists and patients. Conclusion Remimazolam was superior to propofol in terms of safety and efficacy during EUS examinations.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
josephina完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Ava应助njh采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
搜集达人应助lee采纳,获得10
4秒前
华仔应助Coivis采纳,获得88
4秒前
从容芮应助演化的蛙鱼采纳,获得50
5秒前
彭蠡之滨完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
evergarden发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
j7337完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研痛发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
ding应助T_MC郭采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
丘比特应助深海蓝鱼采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6应助tannie采纳,获得30
13秒前
英姑应助彭蠡之滨采纳,获得10
14秒前
黎明森完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
Li完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
核桃应助David采纳,获得30
22秒前
wwww完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
很好完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
YORLAN完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
lee发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
於芷波发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
28秒前
30秒前
打打应助Dr_Zhan采纳,获得10
31秒前
33秒前
平底锅攻击完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
大蚂蚁发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
8R60d8应助王治清采纳,获得10
37秒前
lee完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
选兵完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
冷静惜文发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
38秒前
linkman应助小小郭采纳,获得10
40秒前
Swilder完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
Coivis发布了新的文献求助88
41秒前
Hello应助香山叶正红采纳,获得10
41秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Voyage au bout de la révolution: de Pékin à Sochaux 700
ICDD求助cif文件 500
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
The Secrets of Successful Product Launches 300
The Rise & Fall of Classical Legal Thought 260
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4340685
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3849039
关于积分的说明 12019419
捐赠科研通 3490303
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1915498
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 958503
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 858605