Safety and efficacy of remimazolam versus propofol during EUS: a multicenter randomized controlled study

医学 异丙酚 麻醉 镇静 镇静剂 心肺适能 不利影响 临床终点 随机对照试验 外科 内科学
作者
Jung Wan Choe,Moon Jae Chung,Se Woo Park,Dongwook Oh,Sung Yong Han,Min Jae Yang,Eui Joo Kim,Jae Hee Cho,Kyong Joo Lee,Sung Ill Jang
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:100 (2): 183-191.e1 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.001
摘要

Background and aims Propofol, a widely used sedative in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, is associated with cardiorespiratory suppression. Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative with rapid onset and minimal cardiorespiratory depression. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures. Methods A multicenter randomized controlled study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 in patients who underwent EUS procedures. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or propofol as a sedative agent. The primary endpoint was cardiorespiratory adverse events during the procedure, including desaturation, respiratory depression, hypotension, and tachycardia. Secondary endpoints included the time to achieve sedation, recovery time, quality of sedation, pain at the injection site, and satisfaction of both the endoscopists and patients. Results Four hundred patients enrolled in the study: 200 received remimazolam (10.8±7.7 mg) and 200 received propofol (88.0±49.1 mg). For cardiorespiratory adverse events, the remimazolam group experienced fewer occurrences than the propofol group (8.5% vs. 16%, p=0.022). There was a non-significant trend toward less oxygen desaturation (1.0% vs 3.5%, p= 0.09), respiratory depression (0.5% vs 1.5%, p= 0.62), hypotension (2.5% vs 5.5%, p=0.12) and tachycardia (4.5% vs 5.5%, p=0.68) with remimazolam than with propofol. Remimazolam showed a shorter induction time than propofol, while maintaining comparable awakening and recovery times. Injection site pain was significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group. The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly higher quality of sedation and satisfaction scores than the propofol group, as evaluated by both endoscopists and patients. Conclusion Remimazolam was superior to propofol in terms of safety and efficacy during EUS examinations.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
充电宝应助天真亦旋采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
Gzh_NJ完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
艳阳天完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
123木头人发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
二中所长发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
红姐1993发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
CipherSage应助爹爹采纳,获得10
5秒前
whl完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
牛牛发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Orange应助泽锦臻采纳,获得10
7秒前
Muhammad完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
关耳完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
YESKY发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
天阳发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
hong发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
yannick完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
JamesPei应助WuZY采纳,获得10
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
烟尘发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
大圣来也完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
坚定修勾冲冲冲完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
牛牛完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
坤坤发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
ling发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
22秒前
lily完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
二中所长完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
烟尘完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
乐观的大叔完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
6666发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
高分求助中
Aerospace Standards Index - 2025 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
EEG in Childhood Epilepsy: Initial Presentation & Long-Term Follow-Up 1000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 981
流动的新传统主义与新生代农民工的劳动力再生产模式变迁 500
Elements of Evolutionary Genetics 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5453565
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4561168
关于积分的说明 14280936
捐赠科研通 4485139
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2456484
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1447252
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1422652